Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-lucene-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 65955 invoked from network); 24 Feb 2005 16:57:01 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Feb 2005 16:57:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 3927 invoked by uid 500); 24 Feb 2005 16:56:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-lucene-user-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 3895 invoked by uid 500); 24 Feb 2005 16:56:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact lucene-user-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Lucene Users List" Reply-To: "Lucene Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list lucene-user@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 3882 invoked by uid 99); 24 Feb 2005 16:56:56 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from rwcrmhc13.comcast.net (HELO rwcrmhc13.comcast.net) (204.127.198.39) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 08:56:55 -0800 Received: from [192.168.168.81] (c-24-5-160-217.client.comcast.net[24.5.160.217]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc13) with ESMTP id <2005022416565301500l5sjle>; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 16:56:53 +0000 Message-ID: <421E0755.2030301@apache.org> Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 08:56:53 -0800 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (X11/20041127) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lucene Users List Subject: Re: Possible to mix/match indexes with diff TermInfosWriter.INDEX_INTERVAL ?? References: <421D89B6.20804@newsmonster.org> In-Reply-To: <421D89B6.20804@newsmonster.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Kevin A. Burton wrote: > I finally had some time to take Doug's advice and reburn our indexes > with a larger TermInfosWriter.INDEX_INTERVAL value. It looks like you're using a pre-1.4 version of Lucene. Since 1.4 this is no longer called TermInfosWriter.INDEX_INTERVAL, but rather TermInfosWriter.indexInterval. > Is this setting incompatible with older indexes burned with the lower > value? Prior to 1.4, yes. After 1.4, no. Doug --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-user-help@jakarta.apache.org