Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-lucene-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 49803 invoked from network); 4 Feb 2005 20:29:12 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Feb 2005 20:29:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 62383 invoked by uid 500); 4 Feb 2005 20:29:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-lucene-user-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 62362 invoked by uid 500); 4 Feb 2005 20:29:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact lucene-user-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Lucene Users List" Reply-To: "Lucene Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list lucene-user@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 62349 invoked by uid 99); 4 Feb 2005 20:29:08 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.4 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,FORGED_RCVD_HELO X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from host48.advance.com.ar (HELO infomail2.infovia.com.ar) (200.51.80.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Feb 2005 12:29:06 -0800 Received: from [192.168.0.190] ([127.0.0.1]) by tdimso48.backend.tdata.com.ar (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.02 (built Aug 25 2004)) with ESMTPA id <0IBE005NSNMB91B0@tdimso48.backend.tdata.com.ar> for lucene-user@jakarta.apache.org; Fri, 04 Feb 2005 17:59:05 -0300 (ART) Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 17:29:12 -0300 From: Patricio Keilty Subject: Re: Optimize not deleting all files In-reply-to: <20050204165525.23042.qmail@web30201.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Sender: patriciokeilty@infovia.com.ar To: Lucene Users List Reply-to: patriciokeilty@computer.org Message-id: <4203DB18.8030703@infovia.com.ar> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-Accept-Language: en-us, en X-imss-version: 2.019 X-imss-result: Passed X-imss-scores: Clean:99.90000 C:2 M:3 S:5 R:5 X-imss-settings: Baseline:2 C:2 M:3 S:3 R:3 (0.1500 0.1500) References: <20050204165525.23042.qmail@web30201.mail.mud.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Hi Otis, tried version 1.4.3 without success, old index files still remain in the directory. Also tried not calling optimize(), and still getting the same behaviour, maybe our problem is not related to optimize() call at all. --p Otis Gospodnetic wrote: >Get and try Lucene 1.4.3. One of the older versions had a bug that was >not deleting old index files. > >Otis > >--- yahootintin.1247688@bloglines.com wrote: > > >>Hi, >> >>When I run an optimize in our production environment, old index are >>left in the directory and are not deleted. >> >>My understanding is that an >>optimize will create new index files and all existing index files >>should be >>deleted. Is this correct? >> >>We are running Lucene 1.4.2 on Windows. >> >> >>Any help is appreciated. Thanks! >> >>--------------------------------------------------------------------- >>To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org >>For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-user-help@jakarta.apache.org >> >> >> > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org >For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-user-help@jakarta.apache.org > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-user-help@jakarta.apache.org