lucene-java-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Monsur Hossain" <mon...@monsur.com>
Subject RE: Opinions: Using Lucene as a thin database
Date Tue, 14 Dec 2004 19:13:13 GMT
I think this is a great idea, and one that I've been mulling over to
implement keyword lookups (similar to Flickr.com's tag system).  I
believe the advantage over a relational database comes from Lucene's
inverted index, which is highly optimized for this kind of lookup.  

My concern is that this just shifts the scaling issue to Lucene, and I
haven't found much info on how to scale Lucene vertically.  




> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kevin L. Cobb [mailto:kevin.cobb@emergint.com] 
> Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2004 9:40 AM
> To: lucene-user@jakarta.apache.org
> Subject: Opinions: Using Lucene as a thin database
> 
> 
> I use Lucene as a legitimate search engine which is cool. 
> But, I am also using it as a simple database too. I build an 
> index with a couple of keyword fields that allows me to 
> retrieve values based on exact matches in those fields. This 
> is all I need to do so it works just fine for my needs. I 
> also love the speed. The index is small enough that it is 
> wicked fast. Was wondering if anyone out there was doing the 
> same of it there are any dissenting opinions on using Lucene 
> for this purpose. 
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-user-help@jakarta.apache.org


Mime
View raw message