Mailing-List: contact lucene-user-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Lucene Users List" <lucene-user@jakarta.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: domain of clamprecht@gmail.com
 designates 64.233.170.192 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references;
        b=XZfDFaG6ROgUTMH7gCN6m79e3+4fqJe8fDJCaKvcX//YKYM5fNedfrqsaypb1RiWz5lTFLC1Lf6/w0gDpOjJKP3m7xRkfQoSLAxaCoYeTJRCA2mQ2gK2HcqN9s1bxGhIk0OGicg5C2rwHUabzB+7hGM5qb4uIwedCsz4EOeKiIQ=
Message-ID: <88c6a67204111716084e343252@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 18:08:03 -0600
From: Chris Lamprecht <clamprecht@gmail.com>
Reply-To: Chris Lamprecht <clamprecht@gmail.com>
To: Lucene Users List <lucene-user@jakarta.apache.org>
Subject: Re: Considering intermediary solution before Lucene question
In-Reply-To: <b2763db295c0.b295c0b2763d@optonline.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <b2763db295c0.b295c0b2763d@optonline.net>

John,

It actually should be pretty easy to use just the parts of Lucene you
want (the analyzers, etc) without using the rest.  See the example of
the PorterStemmer from this article:

http://www.onjava.com/pub/a/onjava/2003/01/15/lucene.html?page=2

You could feed a Reader to the tokenStream() method of
PorterStemAnalyzer, and get back a TokenStream, from which you pull
the tokens using the next() method.


On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 18:54:07 -0500, jeichels@optonline.net
<jeichels@optonline.net> wrote:
> 
> Is there a way to use Lucene stemming and stop word removal without using the rest of the tool?   I am downloading the code now, but I imagine the answer might be deeply burried.  I would like to be able to send in a phrase and get back a collection of keywords if possible.
> 
> I am thinking of using an intermediary solution before moving fully to Lucene.  I don't have time to spend a month making a carefully tested, administratable Lucene solution for my site yet, but I intend to do so over time.  Funny thing is the Lucene code likely would only take up a couple hundred of lines, but integration and administration would take me much more time.
> 
> In the meantime, I am thinking I could use perhaps Lucene steming and parsing of words, then stick each search word along with the associated primary key in an indexed MySql table.   Each record I would need to do this to is small with maybe only average 15 userful words.   I would be able to have an in-database solution though ranking, etc would not exist.   This is better then the exact word searching i have currently which is really bad.
> 
> By the way, MySql 4.1.1 has some Lucene type handling, but it too does not have stemming and I am sure it is very slow compaired to Lucene.   Cpanel is still stuck on MySql 4.0.* so many people would not have access to even this basic ability in production systems for some time yet.
> 
> JohnE
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
> 
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-user-help@jakarta.apache.org