Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-lucene-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 46847 invoked from network); 13 Oct 2004 17:53:59 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Oct 2004 17:53:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 82236 invoked by uid 500); 13 Oct 2004 17:53:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-lucene-user-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 82202 invoked by uid 500); 13 Oct 2004 17:53:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact lucene-user-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Lucene Users List" Reply-To: "Lucene Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list lucene-user@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 82186 invoked by uid 99); 13 Oct 2004 17:53:48 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_BY_IP,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: domain of fraschetti@gmail.com designates 64.233.170.197 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.170.197] (HELO mproxy.gmail.com) (64.233.170.197) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 10:53:47 -0700 Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 73so988729rnl for ; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 10:53:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.165.11 with SMTP id n11mr2540296rne; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 10:53:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.72.31 with HTTP; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 10:53:45 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 10:53:45 -0700 From: Chris Fraschetti Reply-To: Chris Fraschetti To: Lucene Users List , nsh@bayt.net Subject: Re: sorting and score ordering In-Reply-To: <416CBEC4.1060709@bayt.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <416CBEC4.1060709@bayt.net> X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Is there a way I can (without recompiling) ... make the score have priority and then my sort take affect when two results have the same rank? Along with that, is there a simple way to assign a new scorer to the searcher? So I can use the same lucene algorithm for my hits, but tweak it a little to fit my needs? -Chris On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 09:36:04 +0400, Nader Henein wrote: > As far as my testing showed, the sort will take priority, because it's > basically an opt-in sort as opposed to the defaulted score sort. So > you're basically displaying a sorted set over all your results as > opposed to sorting the most relevant results. > > Hope this helps > > Nader Henein > > Chris Fraschetti wrote: > > >If I use a Sort instance on my searcher, what will have priority? > >Score or Sort? Assuming I have a pages with .9, .9, and .5 scores, ... > >if the .5 has a higher 'sort' value, will it return higher than one of > >the .9 lucene score values if they are lower? > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-user-help@jakarta.apache.org > > -- ___________________________________________________ Chris Fraschetti, Student CompSci System Admin University of San Francisco e fraschetti@gmail.com | http://meteora.cs.usfca.edu --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-user-help@jakarta.apache.org