lucene-java-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Erik Hatcher <e...@ehatchersolutions.com>
Subject Re: Null or no analyzer
Date Thu, 21 Oct 2004 08:41:23 GMT
I don't like the idea of users having to know how a field was indexed 
though.  That seems to defeat the purpose of a general-purpose 
QueryParser.

	Erik

On Oct 21, 2004, at 2:38 AM, Morus Walter wrote:

> Erik Hatcher writes:
>
>> however perhaps it should be.  Or perhaps there are other options to
>> solve this recurring dilemma folks have with Field.Keyword indexed
>> fields and QueryParser?
>>
> I think one could introduce a special syntax in query parser for
> keyword fields. Query parser wouldn't analyze them at all in this case.
> Something like
> field#Keyword
> or
> field#"keyword containing blanks"
>
> I haven't thought through all consequences for
> field#(keywordA keywordB otherfield:noKeyword)
> but I think it should be doable.
>
> Doesn't make query parser simpler, on the other hand.
>
> Morus
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-user-help@jakarta.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-user-help@jakarta.apache.org


Mime
View raw message