Ah, you may be right (no stack trace in email any more). Somebody
recenly identified a few bottlenecks that, if I recall correctly, were
related to synchronized blocks. I believe Doug committed some
improvements, but I can't remember which version of Lucene that is in.
It's definitely in 1.4.1.
Otis
--- Yonik Seeley <yseeley@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> --- Otis Gospodnetic <otis_gospodnetic@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>
> > The bottleneck seems to be disk IO.
>
> But it's not. Linux is caching the whole file, and
> there really isn't any disk activity at all. Most of
> the threads are blocked on InputStream.refill, not
> waiting for the disk, but waiting for their turn into
> the synchronized block to read from the disk (which is
> why I asked about cacheing above that level).
>
> CPU is a constant 50% on a dual CPU system (meaning
> 100% of 1 cpu).
>
> -Yonik
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
|