lucene-java-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Florian Sauvin <flor...@archive.org>
Subject Re: Lucene vs. MySQL Full-Text
Date Tue, 20 Jul 2004 22:55:16 GMT

On Jul 20, 2004, at 12:29 PM, Tim Brennan wrote:

> Someone came into my office today and asked me about the project I am
> trying to Lucene for -- "why aren't you just using a MySQL full-text
> index to do that" -- after thinking about it for a few minutes, I
> realized I don't have a great answer.
>
> MySQL builds inverted indexes for (in theory) doing the same type of
> lookup that lucene does.  You'd maybe have to build some kind of a 
> layer
> on the front to mimic Lucene's analyzers, but that wouldn't be too
> hard....
>
> My only experience with MySQLfulltext is trivial test apps -- but the
> MySQL world does have some significant advantages (its a known quantity
> from an operations perspective, etc).....  Does anyone out there have
> anything more concrete they can add?
>
> --tim
>
>

I'd say that MySQL full text is much slower if you have a lot of
data... that is one of the reasons we started using lucene (We had a
mysql db to do the search), it's way faster!


--

Florian


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-user-help@jakarta.apache.org


Mime
View raw message