lucene-java-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Kevin A. Burton" <>
Subject Re: RE : Performance of hit highlighting and finding term positions for a specific document
Date Thu, 01 Apr 2004 02:46:34 GMT
Rasik Pandey wrote:

>>I've been meaning to look into good ways to store token offset
>>information to allow for very
>>efficient highlighting and I believe Mark may also be looking
>>into improving the highlighter via
>>other means such as temporary ram indexes. Search the archives
>>to get a background on some of the
>>idea's we've tossed around ('Dmitry's Term Vector stuff, plus
>>some' and 'Demoting results' come to
>>mind as threads that touch this topic).
>I would be nice if that I sent to lucene-dev (see below)
last week became part of these highlighting effors, if appropriate. We use it to collect terms
for a query that searches of multiple indices.
Actually I had to write one for my tests with the highlighter. I'm using 
a MultiSearcher and a WildcardQuery which the highlighter didn't have 
support for. 

My impl was fairly basic so I wouldn't suggest a contribution... I'm 
sure your's is better.  The suggested changes to the highlighter for 
providing tokens would make this work well together.



Please reply using PGP.    
    NewsMonster -
Kevin A. Burton, Location - San Francisco, CA, Cell - 415.595.9965
       AIM/YIM - sfburtonator,  Web -
GPG fingerprint: 5FB2 F3E2 760E 70A8 6174 D393 E84D 8D04 99F1 4412
  IRC - #infoanarchy | #p2p-hackers | #newsmonster

View raw message