Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-lucene-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 48656 invoked from network); 3 Oct 2003 14:23:17 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Oct 2003 14:23:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 11774 invoked by uid 500); 3 Oct 2003 14:22:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-lucene-user-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 11740 invoked by uid 500); 3 Oct 2003 14:22:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact lucene-user-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Lucene Users List" Reply-To: "Lucene Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list lucene-user@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 11685 invoked from network); 3 Oct 2003 14:22:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO smtprelay02.ispgateway.de) (62.67.200.157) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Oct 2003 14:22:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 20228 invoked from network); 3 Oct 2003 14:22:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO tcn.local) (652696@[217.231.231.132]) (envelope-sender ) by smtprelay02.ispgateway.de (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 3 Oct 2003 14:22:45 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tcn.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id B229D1A84A for ; Fri, 3 Oct 2003 16:22:06 +0200 (CEST) From: lucene@nitwit.de To: lucene-user@jakarta.apache.org Subject: storing index in database Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2003 16:22:05 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200310031622.05518.lucene@nitwit.de> X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Hi! Somebody wrote a SQLDirectory for lucene 1.2 (only) but discontinued it for a matter of performance issues. Well, I really would like to store that index at the same place as the data ifself - in the database and not somewhere in the filesystem. I don't quite understand the performance problem at all but in any event if a index sizes only some MBytes why not selecting all the index once out of the DB and keeping it in memory? So, I'd like to ask people here whether there is a way to and which one is the best to store the index reasonably in db. Timo --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-user-help@jakarta.apache.org