Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-lucene-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 36018 invoked from network); 24 Oct 2003 17:30:47 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Oct 2003 17:30:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 60971 invoked by uid 500); 24 Oct 2003 17:30:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-lucene-user-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 60892 invoked by uid 500); 24 Oct 2003 17:30:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact lucene-user-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Lucene Users List" Reply-To: "Lucene Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list lucene-user@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 60879 invoked from network); 24 Oct 2003 17:30:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO Clarion.ucd.ie) (193.1.172.140) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Oct 2003 17:30:31 -0000 Received: from CONVERSION-DAEMON.Clarion.ucd.ie by Clarion.ucd.ie (PMDF V6.2-X17 #30834) id <0HN908I01VATH3@Clarion.ucd.ie> for lucene-user@jakarta.apache.org; Fri, 24 Oct 2003 18:30:29 +0100 (IST) Received: from mojo (mojo.ucd.ie [193.1.132.191]) by Clarion.ucd.ie (PMDF V6.2-X17 #30834) with SMTP id <0HN908H4VVAT8M@Clarion.ucd.ie> for lucene-user@jakarta.apache.org; Fri, 24 Oct 2003 18:30:29 +0100 (IST) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2003 18:29:01 +0100 From: Maurice Coyle Subject: large index query time To: Lucene Users List Message-id: <002301c39a54$50907280$bf8401c1@mojo> MIME-version: 1.0 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-priority: Normal References: <3F98EAD3.2020508@imente.com> X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N hi, i recently merged a whole lot of indexes into one big index for testing purposes. however, now the programs i use to search the index are taking much longer. this may be a stupid question (or very simple) and please tell me if it is, but should this be the case? i mean, i realise it'll take longer to search over a larger collection, but it's taking an order of magnitude longer. this is the reaosn i'm asking, since if lucene is capable of handling large-scale search apps presumably it's set up to search large collections rapidly. maybe there's some steps i can take to speed things up (i optimised the big index when it was finished being created) or something i'm missing? if i can give any information which will help the diagnosis of this problem please specify it. thanks, maurice --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-user-help@jakarta.apache.org