Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-lucene-user-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 6036 invoked from network); 30 Jul 2003 12:40:10 -0000 Received: from exchange.sun.com (192.18.33.10) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 30 Jul 2003 12:40:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 20157 invoked by uid 97); 30 Jul 2003 12:42:45 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-lucene-user@nagoya.betaversion.org Received: (qmail 20150 invoked from network); 30 Jul 2003 12:42:45 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by nagoya.betaversion.org with SMTP; 30 Jul 2003 12:42:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 5728 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jul 2003 12:40:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact lucene-user-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Lucene Users List" Reply-To: "Lucene Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list lucene-user@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 5714 invoked from network); 30 Jul 2003 12:40:06 -0000 Received: from mail5.atl.registeredsite.com (64.224.219.79) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 30 Jul 2003 12:40:06 -0000 Received: from netmail.mail.registeredsite.com ([216.122.69.16]) by mail5.atl.registeredsite.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h6UBfd01009814 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 07:41:39 -0400 Received: (qmail 59406 invoked by uid 89); 30 Jul 2003 12:41:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ehatchersolutions.com) (128.143.59.106) by mail.artaspectsgallery.com with SMTP; 30 Jul 2003 12:41:34 -0000 Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 08:40:11 -0400 Subject: Re: Multiple fields identical terms. Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v552) From: Erik Hatcher To: "Lucene Users List" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: <001e01c35683$b0064010$49098c92@pcara> Message-Id: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.552) X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Wednesday, July 30, 2003, at 06:16 AM, Gregor Heinrich wrote: > I would like to have unique term texts in my term enumeration. That is, > across all fields there should be no duplicate term text. > > An easy solution would be to only use one field. > > But does someone know an alternative way with multiple fields? What about putting both abstract and title together into a single new field called "keywords"? Leave title and abstract there as well, but just append the two strings together (with a space in the middle to tokenize properly! :). Is that a reasonable alternative? What are you trying to accomplish? Erik --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-user-help@jakarta.apache.org