Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-lucene-user-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 62515 invoked from network); 3 Apr 2003 05:44:17 -0000 Received: from exchange.sun.com (192.18.33.10) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Apr 2003 05:44:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 10297 invoked by uid 97); 3 Apr 2003 05:46:15 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-lucene-user@nagoya.betaversion.org Received: (qmail 10290 invoked from network); 3 Apr 2003 05:46:15 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by nagoya.betaversion.org with SMTP; 3 Apr 2003 05:46:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 61837 invoked by uid 500); 3 Apr 2003 05:44:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact lucene-user-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Lucene Users List" Reply-To: "Lucene Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list lucene-user@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 61796 invoked from network); 3 Apr 2003 05:44:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO newgen.co.in) (203.168.76.148) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Apr 2003 05:44:09 -0000 Received: from nhweb.newgen.co.in ([203.168.76.5]) by newgen.co.in (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h335hG802033; Thu, 3 Apr 2003 11:13:17 +0530 Received: from kamal (ws132.newgen.co.in [192.168.5.132]) by nhweb.newgen.co.in (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian -4) with SMTP id h335VM8V022281; Thu, 3 Apr 2003 11:01:24 +0530 Message-ID: <009e01c2f99f$ca3f2f50$8405a8c0@kamal> From: "Amit Kapur" To: Cc: References: <002701c2f8fc$5a25a9e0$8405a8c0@kamal> Subject: Problem while indexing Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2003 10:43:38 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6700 X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N hi all I m facing problems like mentioned below while indexing, If anyone has any help to offer i would to obliged.... **** couldn't rename segments.new to segments **** **** F:\Program Files\OmniDocs Server\ftstest\_3cf.fnm (Too many open files)**** I am trying to index documents using Lucene generating about 30 MB of index (Optimized) which can be raised to about 100 MB or More ( but that would be on a high end server machine). Description of Current Case: #---Each Document has four fields (One Text field, and 3 other Keyword Fields). #---The analyzer is based on a StopFilter and a PorterStemFilter. #---I am using a Compaq PIII, 128 MB RAM, 650 MHz. #---mergeFactor is set to 25, and I am optimizing the index after adding about 20 Documents. #---Using Lucene Release 1.2 Problem Faced After adding about 4000 Documents generating an index of 30 MB, I initially got an error saying, **** couldn't rename segments.new to segments **** after which the IndexReader or the IndexWriter to the current index couldnot be opened. Then I changed a couple of settings, #---mergeFactor=20 and Optimize was called after ever 10 documents. #---Using Lucene Release 1.3 Problem Faced After adding about 1500 Documents generating an index of 10 MB, I initially got an error saying, **** F:\Program Files\OmniDocs Server\ftstest\_3cf.fnm (Too many open files)**** after which the IndexWriter to the current index couldnot be opened. Now my requirement needs to have a much much larger index (practically) and I am actually at the point where these errors are coming unpredictably. Please if anyone could guide me on this ASAP. Thanx in advance Regards Amit PS: I have already read articles in the mail archieve http://www.mail-archive.com/lucene-user@jakarta.apache.org/msg02815.html. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-user-help@jakarta.apache.org