Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-lucene-user-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 92490 invoked from network); 8 Mar 2003 11:28:24 -0000 Received: from exchange.sun.com (192.18.33.10) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Mar 2003 11:28:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 17681 invoked by uid 97); 8 Mar 2003 11:30:18 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-lucene-user@nagoya.betaversion.org Received: (qmail 17674 invoked from network); 8 Mar 2003 11:30:17 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by nagoya.betaversion.org with SMTP; 8 Mar 2003 11:30:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 92164 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2003 11:28:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact lucene-user-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Lucene Users List" Reply-To: "Lucene Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list lucene-user@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 92153 invoked from network); 8 Mar 2003 11:28:20 -0000 Received: from expasy-f.unige.ch (HELO expasy-ng.isb-sib.ch) (192.33.215.142) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Mar 2003 11:28:20 -0000 Received: from caliente (router.isb-sib.ch [192.33.215.254]) (authenticated bits=0) by expasy-ng.isb-sib.ch (8.12.8/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h28BSV3M020485 for ; Sat, 8 Mar 2003 12:28:31 +0100 Message-ID: <002401c2e565$e00903e0$c300000a@caliente> From: "Eric Jain" To: "Lucene Users List" References: <20030307035750.60637.qmail@web12702.mail.yahoo.com> Subject: Re: Potential Lucene drawbacks Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2003 12:28:42 +0100 Organization: Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N > It is not a good way, because such diagrams contain a lot of > dependencies which are not in the ``original'' diagrams. Moreover the > tool cannot recognize what objects are important and what objects > would be excluded from the diagrams. +1 I only use hand-built UML [1], and only for illustrating certain key aspects or behaviors of the system I am documenting. In my opinion, automatic generated diagrams offer no advantage whatsoever over Javadoc. Or perhaps I just haven't found the proper tool yet :-) [1] http://www.navision.com/hq/view.asp?categoryid=368&documentid=428,4 -- Eric Jain --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-user-help@jakarta.apache.org