lucene-java-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrzej Bialecki ...@getopt.org>
Subject Re: Potential Lucene drawbacks
Date Fri, 07 Mar 2003 19:58:25 GMT
Leo Galambos wrote:
>>I believe there are tools out there that will analyze Java sources and
>>create UML class diagrams from that.  I believe TogetherJ or one of
>>those 'all in one' tools can do that.
> 
> 
> It is not a good way, because such diagrams contain a lot of dependencies
> which are not in the ``original'' diagrams. Moreover the tool cannot
> recognize what objects are important and what objects would be excluded
> from the diagrams.

I fully agree that nothing can beat a handcrafted UML diagram, made by 
someone who knows which details are irrelevant for the key concepts. 
That's what the models are for - to present a complex reality in an 
abstract, simplified way, by disregarding things that are not important 
for the purpose of explaining the concept...

However, automated tools still can go a long way, especially if you 
don't have time or expertise to create diagrams on your own, with 
unknown code base...

In my experience, for creating class diagrams tools like TogetherJ do 
acceptable job when used to automatically reverse-engineer existing 
source code. But in the case of sequence diagrams they are just 
pathetic... You'll have a chance to see two of them in the package I 
sent to Otis. :-)

-- 
Best regards,
Andrzej Bialecki

-------------------------------------------------
Software Architect, System Integration Specialist
-------------------------------------------------
FreeBSD developer (http://www.freebsd.org)



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-user-help@jakarta.apache.org


Mime
View raw message