Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-lucene-user-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 78975 invoked from network); 11 Apr 2002 15:18:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Apr 2002 15:18:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 1983 invoked by uid 97); 11 Apr 2002 15:18:52 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-lucene-user@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 1962 invoked by uid 97); 11 Apr 2002 15:18:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact lucene-user-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Lucene Users List" Reply-To: "Lucene Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list lucene-user@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 1951 invoked from network); 11 Apr 2002 15:18:51 -0000 Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message Subject: Incremental vs Full indexing MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 16:18:49 +0100 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.5762.3 Message-ID: <8AE862AA058B3947A287DD6FAA59A07516EC62@mercury.centaurnet.co.uk> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Incremental vs Full indexing Thread-Index: AcHhbC6J+pK7zCdgTlKro0YUDuJJEg== From: "Andrew Smith" To: X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N I wish to use incremental indexing in an application based on Lucene. Do I need to preiodcally perform a full re-build of the index to keep the index in an efficient state or can I simply use the IndexWriter's Optimise() function instead? TIA Andy -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: