Return-Path: 
 <lucene-user-return-976-qmlist-jakarta-archive-lucene-user=jakarta.apache.org@jakarta.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-lucene-user-archive@apache.org
Received: (qmail 15069 invoked from network); 22 Feb 2002 03:48:52 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131)
  by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Feb 2002 03:48:52 -0000
Received: (qmail 19007 invoked by uid 97); 22 Feb 2002 03:48:59 -0000
Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-lucene-user@jakarta.apache.org
Received: (qmail 18976 invoked by uid 97); 22 Feb 2002 03:48:59 -0000
Mailing-List: contact lucene-user-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:lucene-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:lucene-user-subscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lucene-user-help@jakarta.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:lucene-user@jakarta.apache.org>
List-Id: "Lucene Users List" <lucene-user.jakarta.apache.org>
Reply-To: "Lucene Users List" <lucene-user@jakarta.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list lucene-user@jakarta.apache.org
Received: (qmail 18965 invoked from network); 22 Feb 2002 03:48:58 -0000
From: "Daniel Calvo" <dcalvo@ig.com.br>
To: "Lucene Users List" <lucene-user@jakarta.apache.org>
Subject: RE: Boolean AND query
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 00:49:57 -0300
Message-ID: <JHELIJFFHIJCPHDAENDFOEBLCEAA.dcalvo@ig.com.br>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
In-reply-to: <D15E9D991E0FD41184C90080C80D274650B633@MUSCOVITE>
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2462.0000
Importance: Normal
X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N
X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

Hi,

A few days ago some people discussed query semantics in a thread with the subject "Lucene Query Structure" in the developers list.
As I understand, this is not a bug but a feature (someone please correct me if I'm wrong). I suggest you to take a look at this
thread (in the archives). I think you'll find some answers that

Regards,

--Daniel

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Aruna Raghavan [mailto:ArunaR@opin.com]
> Sent: quinta-feira, 21 de fevereiro de 2002 18:58
> To: 'Lucene Users List'
> Subject: RE: Boolean AND query
>
>
> Yes, + and - do work. In our UI, we try to validate the expression user
> entered by using pattern matching. I was trying to simplify this by simply
> using AND/OR and disallowing +/- (as it could be confusing to a user). I
> guess now the question is what causing the AND to fail? Is it a bug?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Daniel Calvo [mailto:dcalvo@ig.com.br]
> Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 3:55 PM
> To: Lucene Users List
> Subject: RE: Boolean AND query
>
>
> > From: Aruna Raghavan [mailto:ArunaR@opin.com]
> > Daniel,
> > Thanks for the response but I am going by the definition of the
> > Syntax in Lucene FAQ:
> <snip>
> >
> > According to the above, AND and OR should work too, right?
>
> I'm afraid not. Have you tried '+' as I've suggested?
>
> --Daniel
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> <mailto:lucene-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> <mailto:lucene-user-help@jakarta.apache.org>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:lucene-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:lucene-user-help@jakarta.apache.org>
>


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:lucene-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:lucene-user-help@jakarta.apache.org>