Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-lucene-user-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 3521 invoked from network); 15 Nov 2001 08:46:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Nov 2001 08:46:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 15574 invoked by uid 97); 15 Nov 2001 08:46:54 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-lucene-user@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 15558 invoked by uid 97); 15 Nov 2001 08:46:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact lucene-user-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Lucene Users List" Reply-To: "Lucene Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list lucene-user@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 15546 invoked from network); 15 Nov 2001 08:46:53 -0000 Message-ID: <027301c16db2$38cab6e0$0b01a8c0@168.1.8.Domainrelevanz> From: "Kelvin Tan" To: "Lucene Users List" , "David Bonilla" References: <003401c16c43$a4882900$f1b295c3@mikael3> <000d01c16c68$09705580$6b00a8c0@Zurich> <00e901c16d09$51f21f40$6b00a8c0@Zurich> <3BF26D67.7AE218E8@blackwell.co.uk> <012101c16d71$8538aaa0$0b01a8c0@168.1.8.Domainrelevanz> <01d701c16daf$d3ac18a0$6b00a8c0@Zurich> Subject: Re: Searching all the fields (and II) Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 16:47:53 +0800 Organization: Relevanz Pte Ltd MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N >First thank to Kelvin Tan and the rest of the people for his support and help. You're most welcome. >Well, I talked to my boss and I suggested the posibility of create a new field with all the content. This thing duplicate the Index but >the search was still very very quick. But the man didn�t accept this way so... now I make one search for each of my fields and, at >the same time, I filt the hits with a HashSet. What do you think about this ? Are you looking to search on all the fields? If so, I guess this is an OK approach, but I believe your results may be distorted unless all Hits are sorted by score before adding to the HashSet. Regards, Kelvin -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: