From issues-return-3852-archive-asf-public=cust-asf.ponee.io@lucene.apache.org Tue Nov 5 17:38:02 2019 Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [207.244.88.153]) by mx-eu-01.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id EC877180648 for ; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 18:38:01 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 92181 invoked by uid 500); 5 Nov 2019 17:38:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact issues-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list issues@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 92167 invoked by uid 99); 5 Nov 2019 17:38:01 -0000 Received: from mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (HELO mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.139) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Nov 2019 17:38:01 +0000 Received: from jira-he-de.apache.org (static.172.67.40.188.clients.your-server.de [188.40.67.172]) by mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 95C4BE0295 for ; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 17:38:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-he-de.apache.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by jira-he-de.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at jira-he-de.apache.org) with ESMTP id 100F07801FF for ; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 17:38:00 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2019 17:38:00 +0000 (UTC) From: "Joel Bernstein (Jira)" To: issues@lucene.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-13892) Add postfilter support to {!join} queries MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13892?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16967710#comment-16967710 ] Joel Bernstein commented on SOLR-13892: --------------------------------------- I'm not arguing that this is the best possible solution. I'm arguing that in common scenarios this join has proven to be 700% faster than the existing implementation. Unless there is another committer volunteering to improve the join, then I don't think we should block progress on this improvement. > Add postfilter support to {!join} queries > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: SOLR-13892 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13892 > Project: Solr > Issue Type: Improvement > Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) > Components: query parsers > Affects Versions: master (9.0) > Reporter: Jason Gerlowski > Priority: Major > Attachments: SOLR-13892.patch > > > The JoinQParserPlugin would be a lot performant in many use-cases if it could operate as a post-filter, especially when doc-values for the involved fields are available. > With this issue, I'd like to propose a post-filter implementation for the {{join}} qparser. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-help@lucene.apache.org