lucene-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From will martin <wmartin...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Customize score algorithm
Date Sat, 16 Apr 2016 01:55:48 GMT
crikey.  here it is:   http://ciir.cs.umass.edu/


> On Apr 15, 2016, at 9:54 PM, will martin <wmartinusa@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> http://ciir.edu
> 
> 
>> On Apr 15, 2016, at 9:53 PM, will martin <wmartinusa@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> coir.edu there;s a paper by croft et al about the impact of structured data onslaught
being handled by IR engines with strengths in unstructured.
>> 
>>> On Apr 15, 2016, at 1:01 PM, Diego Bernardes <di3go.bernardes@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>> 
>>> I'm a long time user of Elasticsearch and Solr, have used in lots of
>>> projects, but until now didn't need to change how the documents are scored.
>>> 
>>> The actual project my team is developing have a very specific need of
>>> precision and scoring.
>>> Recentely found Algolia, they built a search engine from scratch using a
>>> different aproach from Lucene. The main diffence is on scoring, in my
>>> opinion the way they score is better suited to structured documents (like
>>> products on a ecommerce), the sort is like a sql database, when there are
>>> criterias and they are sorted in order.
>>> 
>>> The way Lucene works with a single float score works very well for
>>> unestructured documents, but when you know exactly what you want and in
>>> what field, Algolia approach seems better.
>>> 
>>> The question is, there is any way to do overwrite the way Lucene score? I
>>> need to have several fields or a object, intead of a single float,
>>> something like this:
>>> 
>>> {
>>> exactMatch: 2,
>>> typo: 0,
>>> customFieldScore: 10
>>> ...
>>> }
>>> 
>>> Thanks!
>> 
> 
http://ciir.cs.umass.edu/


Mime
View raw message