lucene-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Lucene vs Solr Indexing Speed on Sample data Issue!!!
Date Mon, 15 Jun 2015 19:17:04 GMT
And what does high throughput actually mean in terms of number of documents
per second and bytes (or terms) per document?



On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 11:56 AM, Upayavira <uv@odoko.co.uk> wrote:

> Please post the original question here, so that everything people need
> to review your question is included within this thread!
>
> Oh, and for a high-throughput system, 8Gb RAM doesn't sound like much. A
> Lucene index, whether inside Solr or not, benefits from a lot of RAM.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Upayavira
>
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2015, at 05:19 AM, Argho Chatterjee wrote:
> > Hello Everyone,
> >
> > I had posted a question on stackoverflow.com after performing a few POCs
> >
> > My hadrware consist of a single i-3 intel processor (4 CPU as per
> > "dxdiag"
> > on run ), 8GB Ram, Laptop machine.
> >
> > My Question Link :
> >
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/30823314/lucene-vs-solr-indexning-speed-for-sampe-data
> >
> > but no one could solve it as of now..
> > I hope the question I posted is undertandable.
> >
> > Please if anyone could help me out with the indexing speed of Solr (way
> > slower) vs Lucene (way faster)..
> >
> > I am trying to build a module for real time indexing and querying, and
> > the
> > traffic is high, POC pass with Lucene for handling High Traffic for
> > Indexing, for Solr It is not able to do so..
> >
> > Again My Machine Spec :
> > HP, intel core i3, 8GB ram, TB HDD.
> >
> > Please let me know if there is a problem with Solr or am I doing anything
> > wrong.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Argho
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message