lucene-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Itamar Syn-Hershko <ita...@code972.com>
Subject Re: relationships between shapes in Lucene-Spatial
Date Thu, 22 May 2014 12:48:46 GMT
You have to remember there is a margin error of about 2.5%. The Lucene.NET
port is in par with spatial4j 0.3.

--

Itamar Syn-Hershko
http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
Freelance Developer & Consultant
Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>


On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 3:45 PM, regina <regina@ayende.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> I am looking into how Lucene-Spatial handles relationships between shapes,
> and seeing some weird (or at least I think that they are weird) results.
> I am trying to work out how the relationships are calculated and I believe
> I
> understand the theory behind it.
> The results I am seeing, does not fit into the theory I've read up to now.
> For example:
> I am trying to test whether POLYGON ((4.5 4.5, 6.5 4.5, 6.5 6.5, 4.5 6.5,
> 4.5 4.5)) is within POLYGON ((6 6, 7 6, 7 7, 6 7, 6 6)). Surprisingly, I am
> seeing that it is "within".
> I am trying this with GeohashPrefixTree strategy and max tree level 8.
>
> Is this the answer that should be getting, or am I doing something wrong?
>
> It should be noted that I am using .Net port of Lucene-Spatial to query
> this.
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/relationships-between-shapes-in-Lucene-Spatial-tp4137641.html
> Sent from the Lucene - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message