Mailing-List: contact general-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: general@lucene.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of alghoshal@gmail.com designates
 209.85.212.49 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <ACEDB0BC-04FB-4D79-B160-741D180BC309@bluesky-information.com>
References: <5DA56B441F9D7242B155782791BF4AD531671E@MABIS1.easynet.local>
	<CAHT6S2Y8Zo6kgeupC4ABkiE9rpKhsEFNw4SA5kPE9Ny+2zo2bw@mail.gmail.com>
	<ACEDB0BC-04FB-4D79-B160-741D180BC309@bluesky-information.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 15:02:03 +0530
Message-ID: 
 <CAHT6S2YkP8L+wdPz0icKRBGvepHLT4WH_NxdTTkYcTQaW9+vNA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Shard and Replicas in Lucene
From: Aloke Ghoshal <alghoshal@gmail.com>
To: general@lucene.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b6dcd089eafac04e471d82a

--047d7b6dcd089eafac04e471d82a
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Hi,

Refer to these:
http://zookeeper.apache.org/doc/r3.3.6/zookeeperAdmin.html#sc_supportedPlatforms&
https://support.lucidworks.com/entries/23291411-LucidWorks-in-cloud-mode-SolrCloud-on-Windows

Regards,
Aloke


On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Marc Loeb <
marc.loeb@bluesky-information.com> wrote:

> Hi
>
> I think as well using SolrCloud or ElasticSearch is a better choice. All
> our other components run in .Net on Azure with Windows. Even that Azure
> enables now any Linux OS I would prefer Windows OS for production due to
> more knowlege available in our team. What are the reasons to prefer Linux
> over Windows for SolrCloud you have in mind?
>
> Many thanks,
> Marc
>
> On 20.08.2013, at 21:41, "Aloke Ghoshal" <alghoshal@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > You'd be much better off switching over to SolrCloud. You could use an
> > existing dot net client library (such as SolrNet) to connect to
> SolrCloud.
> > The other bit to keep in mind is that for production you should ideally
> be
> > running SolrCloud on a *nix (Linux/ Unix) OS.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Aloke
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 12:32 AM, Marc Loeb <
> > marc.loeb@bluesky-information.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> I have an Lucene.NET implementation with as a prototype that I need to
> >> rework. It seems to me that Lucene.NET is not up to date (last commit
> >> Jan 13) and seems to use Lucene 3.0.3.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> My major issue is that I scaling was not considered at design time, but
> >> needs to be done now. Lucene does not support shards and replicas (but
> >> solr can) - at least from my first impression.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> My current alternatives for scaling seem to look like this:
> >>
> >> -        Move to Solar cloud, abandon the current implementation
> >>
> >> -        Create a shard/replica mechanism for Lucene
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Any ideas? Thanks!
> >>
> >> Marc
> >>
> >>
>


On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Marc Loeb <
marc.loeb@bluesky-information.com> wrote:

> Hi
>
> I think as well using SolrCloud or ElasticSearch is a better choice. All
> our other components run in .Net on Azure with Windows. Even that Azure
> enables now any Linux OS I would prefer Windows OS for production due to
> more knowlege available in our team. What are the reasons to prefer Linux
> over Windows for SolrCloud you have in mind?
>
> Many thanks,
> Marc
>
> On 20.08.2013, at 21:41, "Aloke Ghoshal" <alghoshal@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > You'd be much better off switching over to SolrCloud. You could use an
> > existing dot net client library (such as SolrNet) to connect to
> SolrCloud.
> > The other bit to keep in mind is that for production you should ideally
> be
> > running SolrCloud on a *nix (Linux/ Unix) OS.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Aloke
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 12:32 AM, Marc Loeb <
> > marc.loeb@bluesky-information.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> I have an Lucene.NET implementation with as a prototype that I need to
> >> rework. It seems to me that Lucene.NET is not up to date (last commit
> >> Jan 13) and seems to use Lucene 3.0.3.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> My major issue is that I scaling was not considered at design time, but
> >> needs to be done now. Lucene does not support shards and replicas (but
> >> solr can) - at least from my first impression.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> My current alternatives for scaling seem to look like this:
> >>
> >> -        Move to Solar cloud, abandon the current implementation
> >>
> >> -        Create a shard/replica mechanism for Lucene
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Any ideas? Thanks!
> >>
> >> Marc
> >>
> >>
>

--047d7b6dcd089eafac04e471d82a--