Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-lucene-general-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D1323D1C2 for ; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 15:42:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 90959 invoked by uid 500); 7 Aug 2012 15:42:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-general-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 90859 invoked by uid 500); 7 Aug 2012 15:42:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 90848 invoked by uid 99); 7 Aug 2012 15:42:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Aug 2012 15:42:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of homernabble@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.176] (HELO mail-qc0-f176.google.com) (209.85.216.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Aug 2012 15:42:14 +0000 Received: by qcsc21 with SMTP id c21so3119044qcs.35 for ; Tue, 07 Aug 2012 08:41:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=IQbjB5bxJ47yzZV0lEG8nBnp1SClCE0jgT7qExN4TSQ=; b=FoJ3iilYBxz8nigaxKMb8ZQmDrXhP99n1UVRfgb2j9BFomZC29g/hcL3Kwypx4/qml 0JfLZ4bRxgPgOHi/6bmFWWZf+twFEJfWnf1zTtbreto1HINPnVE/5O/4fGr+dmzqPa9G UNFfjSLnlTFLscPyK38oV5iRWxRGNeIC4lQVfBiN1HZway9HE0nPCi9GST9aQ0eNKsz1 mI0RA0/wwAaY8msc26t89/NqLAjaRRt4YL25r9M3WdY/xJmxNVfaHnvUO6RCYRO74O+Y ZZTKi7qcT2YWG2Xmt0UEb/rDTswgRPU+/SWDEnIbERW5gEptOBRCulVo7ShMuGygCe7Z wBNw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.195.199 with SMTP id ed7mr24773276qab.22.1344354113634; Tue, 07 Aug 2012 08:41:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.49.110.42 with HTTP; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 08:41:53 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2012 11:41:53 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Is query-time Join actually in Lucene 3.6? From: Homer Nabble To: general@lucene.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf300fb36b6542d104c6aed56d X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --20cf300fb36b6542d104c6aed56d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 This page states "New query-time joining is more flexible (but less performant) than index-time joins." https://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/Lucene3.6 However, I download Lucene 3.6.0 (and 3.6.1) and there is no mention of query-time join in the CHANGES.TXT. Also, I see no binaries for org.apache.lucene.search.join - though the API doc in the same download contains information about this package: lucene-3.6.0/docs/api/all/org/apache/lucene/search/join/package-frame.html Could someone please let me know what the story is with query time joins? Thanks! --20cf300fb36b6542d104c6aed56d--