From general-return-3872-apmail-lucene-general-archive=lucene.apache.org@lucene.apache.org Tue Aug 7 17:18:21 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-lucene-general-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CA98BC3C5 for ; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 17:18:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 20777 invoked by uid 500); 7 Aug 2012 17:18:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-general-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 20686 invoked by uid 500); 7 Aug 2012 17:18:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 20676 invoked by uid 99); 7 Aug 2012 17:18:20 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Aug 2012 17:18:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.216.176] (HELO mail-qc0-f176.google.com) (209.85.216.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Aug 2012 17:18:14 +0000 Received: by qcsc21 with SMTP id c21so3228380qcs.35 for ; Tue, 07 Aug 2012 10:17:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=2h8Zb1ZsAI1TZzhS3ZVfKVG0CoddShYK+a/ZFZh7dqg=; b=VSOMuibhIREaTLvrD3CeyYXOMBewxioeP9N9GQyAE8H0w+4+PAs58MRYj7vLw+zw2A rTy95fxhHYRV3f1hrpXA0S88u2icbO/s/D9WgjDLV3ZIQLE47KrQtNoIz8utaizWf2bp ZMYDn2ogbWS1JnnnWtoIQZwCjE7Eglocg97p8OQcJTrCPQX/xodtGLW28PERi2URlj7b hQuqFGGoabPZeIkYDmSTAYMnnD65R9b2nEjdQ8Db0/ffr6CDlyQT8K0lhD4zCseA0sM+ KbIvCtwquWeBi3gaEOGq4N0EqgLEbqxlCeV3Cideu7Bn4A1WrN8/kMk+Jbq6wzNrWd8A h4Lw== Received: by 10.224.183.20 with SMTP id ce20mr25176968qab.35.1344359872864; Tue, 07 Aug 2012 10:17:52 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.49.74.129 with HTTP; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 10:17:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Michael McCandless Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2012 13:17:32 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Is query-time Join actually in Lucene 3.6? To: general@lucene.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQklUlmi2jObjXuRn482sQkM+EKcWno2jhjvxbWhZLhqNLNdmJxMe8kHqS29r7d/INDDxtKa Query-time join lives under Lucene's contrib/join in 3.6: http://lucene.apache.org/core/3_6_1/lucene-contrib/index.html#join Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Homer Nabble wrote: > This page states "New query-time joining is more flexible (but less > performant) than > index-time joins." > > https://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/Lucene3.6 > > However, I download Lucene 3.6.0 (and 3.6.1) and there is no mention of > query-time join in the CHANGES.TXT. > > Also, I see no binaries for org.apache.lucene.search.join - though the API > doc in the same download contains information about this package: > lucene-3.6.0/docs/api/all/org/apache/lucene/search/join/package-frame.html > > Could someone please let me know what the story is with query time joins? > > Thanks!