lucene-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Steven A Rowe <sar...@syr.edu>
Subject RE: Did Neo4j really add XA transactions to Lucene
Date Wed, 20 Jul 2011 20:01:04 GMT
Hi eialbur,

The general@lucene.apache.org mailing list has few subscribers, and is mostly focused on administrative
and cross-platform issues.

I recommend you repost to dev@lucene.apache.org.  More info here: <http://lucene.apache.org/java/docs/mailinglists.html#Java%20Developer%20List>

Steve

> -----Original Message-----
> From: eialbur [mailto:ronalbury@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2011 3:53 PM
> To: general@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Did Neo4j really add XA transactions to Lucene
> 
> I am interested in Neo4j (as well as Lucene).  I have seen a number of
> postings asking for XA transaction support from Lucene.  Neo4j contends
> that
> they are completely ACID XA transaction compliant, including their use of
> Lucene for text indexing.
> 
> Is this correct?  Do you know if they got Lucene to fully support the
> transactions (e.g. would work if I pulled the plug at an inopportune
> moment), or are they just sort-of transactional.
> 
> If they are fully transactional, will Lucene take advantage of the Neo4j
> open source and provide transactions for everyone (Neo4j volunteered for
> you
> to copy their source).  I would LOVE to use Lucene for the full text
> indexing in my mysql database!!
> 
> I have misgivings about all of this and would greatly appreciate someone
> with a greater understanding than I have stepping up and explaining to me
> what's going on here.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> --
> View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Did-
> Neo4j-really-add-XA-transactions-to-Lucene-tp3186471p3186471.html
> Sent from the Lucene - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Mime
View raw message