Mailing-List: contact general-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: general@lucene.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of hossman_lucene@fucit.org
 designates 208.69.42.181 as permitted sender)
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 09:00:13 -0800 (PST)
From: Chris Hostetter <hossman_lucene@fucit.org>
To: general list <general@lucene.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [PMC] Next Steps on Lucene.NET
In-Reply-To: <F8D56500-F314-4409-AEB7-A28ECCE35A2F@apache.org>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.1012210846050.26831@radix.cryptio.net>
References: <F8D56500-F314-4409-AEB7-A28ECCE35A2F@apache.org>
User-Agent: Alpine 1.10 (DEB 962 2008-03-14)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII


: point, it's either the Attic or Incubator and I'm leaning toward Attic.  
: However, I think it makes sense to give one more chance by saying:  You 
: have until January 31 to put together a proposal for going back to the 
: Incubator.  Please see http://incubator.apache.org for what such a 
: proposal entails.

I'm not certain the attic is appropriate -- my understanding is that it's 
the final resting place for "projects" (TLP, ie: an entire PMC) that are 
being disolved at a foundation level via board resolution.

Within a PMC, like Lucene, the decision to retire a specific sub-projects 
and mailing lists probably doesn't need to require a board resolution.

but i could be wrong.

In either case, having a hard date seems like a good idea -- i thought one 
had been established before, but i guess not.

-Hoss