From general-return-2928-apmail-lucene-general-archive=lucene.apache.org@lucene.apache.org Sat Dec 25 06:28:37 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 72266 invoked from network); 25 Dec 2010 06:28:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 Dec 2010 06:28:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 69842 invoked by uid 500); 25 Dec 2010 06:28:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-general-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 69509 invoked by uid 500); 25 Dec 2010 06:28:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 69501 invoked by uid 99); 25 Dec 2010 06:28:33 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 25 Dec 2010 06:28:33 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [66.94.238.134] (HELO web130107.mail.mud.yahoo.com) (66.94.238.134) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Sat, 25 Dec 2010 06:28:27 +0000 Received: (qmail 58624 invoked by uid 60001); 25 Dec 2010 06:28:05 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1293258485; bh=NPGB3ME1kSLHf28jI6yEGsnT1vwTMPq2jwEle34vVGc=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=onBeZbg0ZTMt9mmdLEW0Dk7wBGnp17EJQPWwYN1ePeYop5+Ne3Gvt+X+EP05POCrrJVvHkfMv0FK1ncv9RTjPrCyhyWfLApI9wNcAGI5Cr74R4EYIGPseTz7353HbPuSncTXSOB5Qd8Hvf3EyEHLs9fQo6sE1CxwqqrjEwRcAxA= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=RrFLrR8qKAw4l0akZcgLc361a6UkvVpQYR5Xu9+I65x4GSH5RDU3HkwsCc6jteu4dKcAkHSyGkHO+UOfvwqxLjkaHIBT8dcmVWWNle3mwv1bUtp0oE1muRH/Y+uXkTGhFVf6gnXfjz6RT24p47bVB4aSYqbjIBeTcqWWUQkRMC4=; Message-ID: <139976.48561.qm@web130107.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: hTqt9MAVM1nGQkTUUL.ABCPFrChUOoKnJY4BfLfx.9.amkq OdaFiHoTvuI0oVobUnwEuCkKGYewSAYmpX7vRuuEKetSi_ZhCG4N8NzQc0Vw YzODK9atr.EbMhqqIjIjrQmo3C9CSGOu3ErTtfwQIrql5sE_yF9oJSiME6Py ZcmOQZi6lR_iZG020CP_RtTh4alIUZez10wHL7qTV1WTHn7XipUdiPH2WiaF yJO9HBjf9VvrLCIAKDmk1Qu8EXJOhc7mC6l0AuISL65wl8kHNKDTYptBh5QC e6pMy3jFgaHCzP8tonH9MhSJPTDbm1K2h1I7jrz8FVJjCirW1_DrD_Sfr_aB fvHLs5w7o50pvUl17exAZMCEGrr28EG3TQ_.MFMthf2plKHReOx1zxKgHP2F kBZzgFohkJfk3 Received: from [59.115.161.157] by web130107.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 22:28:04 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/553 YahooMailWebService/0.8.107.285259 References: Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 22:28:04 -0800 (PST) From: Otis Gospodnetic Subject: Re: [PMC] Next Steps on Lucene.NET To: general@lucene.apache.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Personally, I would be *very* interested whether moving Lucene.NET to GitHub will make a difference in terms of progress and style of development. Maybe forking, pull requests, and the whole "social" thing makes it easier for people to participate. Since Lucene.NET has struggled for years at ASF, this would be a great opportunity to see if the above makes a difference. My 0.02 NT Otis ---- Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch Lucene ecosystem search :: http://search-lucene.com/ ----- Original Message ---- > From: Grant Ingersoll > To: general@lucene.apache.org > Sent: Thu, December 23, 2010 10:41:18 AM > Subject: Re: [PMC] Next Steps on Lucene.NET > > > On Dec 21, 2010, at 12:00 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote: > > > > > : point, it's either the Attic or Incubator and I'm leaning toward Attic. > > : However, I think it makes sense to give one more chance by saying: You > > : have until January 31 to put together a proposal for going back to the > > : Incubator. Please see http://incubator.apache.org for what such a > > : proposal entails. > > > > I'm not certain the attic is appropriate -- my understanding is that it's > > the final resting place for "projects" (TLP, ie: an entire PMC) that are > > being disolved at a foundation level via board resolution. > > > > Within a PMC, like Lucene, the decision to retire a specific sub-projects > > and mailing lists probably doesn't need to require a board resolution. > > > > but i could be wrong. > > OK, I'm not sure either. I will check. We could certainly just mothball it >here, but I don't think that is necessarily what we want either. > > > > > In either case, having a hard date seems like a good idea -- i thought one > > had been established before, but i guess not. > > The hard date of addressing the 4 issues was set for the end of the year. I >don't think any of them have been addressed. There was a big discussion for a >while, but it doesn't seem like anyone has done any of the actual work, even >something as simple as updating the website. This next date, in my mind, is to >make it clear that the Lucene PMC is done being responsible for Lucene.NET by >Jan. 31. I am more than willing to help them move somewhere else, but it is up >to them to say where that is. > > -Grant