Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 55558 invoked from network); 28 Nov 2010 15:47:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Nov 2010 15:47:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 51014 invoked by uid 500); 28 Nov 2010 15:47:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-general-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 50725 invoked by uid 500); 28 Nov 2010 15:47:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 50717 invoked by uid 99); 28 Nov 2010 15:47:50 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 15:47:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of rcmuir@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.48] (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.214.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 15:47:43 +0000 Received: by bwz9 with SMTP id 9so3586685bwz.35 for ; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 07:47:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=V3sJ5LAUyv+e4gdCf9TZv0CdikAxIyHbbdV55Pwi5zQ=; b=S+wYHT7Ev+dMrAJCXBHDUGzkuXb446M9HqKphqR2Flb/8FgEKak0WXGES/02PAASAC dRFjlZk1cscIVHw3fFMql21MLh/HNtyh36QwGkgBxgXeb2D4VW8CRDrBweIol+WPg+si jr8FY1qvMQqqVKmAwfO1OYbZG327CvR8NjES0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=DxscBFRvr1J3yiK2p/4oRpIacSHvlUwOoPXTNzMb0ijJEmHfFuyoyGlMFTlNyTraVc aF7AdtJlcaNWg4HlYhyHeKQDyuKpwK6UlGCNrJgF+Vuz+NinaH4DBUlDDJenRqZphWjp mDWl4tGJDVskvrq8okSzH51vedzKpW/UXHrGY= Received: by 10.204.120.130 with SMTP id d2mr3781457bkr.214.1290959242531; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 07:47:22 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.77.201 with HTTP; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 07:47:01 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <001001cb8e97$57538b90$05faa2b0$@thetaphi.de> References: <001001cb8e97$57538b90$05faa2b0$@thetaphi.de> From: Robert Muir Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 10:47:01 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Lucene 3.0.3 and 2.9.4 artifacts (take 1) To: general@lucene.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 7:58 PM, Uwe Schindler wrote: > Hi all Lucene Java committers and PMC, > Artifacts (incl. Maven) and Changes.txt can be found here: > http://s.apache.org/LGM > I downloaded the source zip files for 2.9.4 and 3.0.3, and the tests failed for me. This is because of https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1756 (also another similar test fixed in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2398) Additionally i got a compiler warning when compiling benchmark: [javac] C:\Users\rmuir\workspace\2.9.4\lucene-2.9.4\contrib\benchmark\src\java\org\apache\lucene\benchmark\bytask\utils\Algorithm.java:69: warning: non-varargs call of varargs method with inexact argument type for last parameter [javac] cast to java.lang.Object for a varargs call [javac] cast to java.lang.Object[] for a non-varargs call and to suppress this warning [javac] PerfTask task = (PerfTask) cnstr.newInstance(paramObj);