Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 72408 invoked from network); 28 Nov 2010 21:58:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Nov 2010 21:58:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 34431 invoked by uid 500); 28 Nov 2010 21:58:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-general-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 34397 invoked by uid 500); 28 Nov 2010 21:58:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 34389 invoked by uid 99); 28 Nov 2010 21:58:05 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 21:58:05 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of rcmuir@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.48] (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.214.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 21:57:59 +0000 Received: by bwz9 with SMTP id 9so3787279bwz.35 for ; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 13:57:38 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=oSrOJpr9Ff34FEJVNVTcGofMJtrc4z0jCTd3Vs56gCk=; b=LNqeAWh9uHmy4Z3iVwPOojoyErg6i5NSEnzSJkbwo6mklZvNzrZ53JYaDX2moew3nq JjoWpvnKUtyFvo12nnNxHUB/LyLK+rDYmKPvKLo9vLmTEKgOpWFinS0khpIOV2C7zhhW JZmbyiufAvvZQZrFIv4+2VPtWnhgiXYeCL04A= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=bEO4rDVvnN9nmo9+3b0LfGeRS4VbWrXvtsKgFdcQ1zPQ79oVy/AgNwp7IGJW0a14q/ yBNvmcbsZxeanRRSarHVtVspJWIx91mA1Go4Y7u6OmJXKiSxis01mNJgoI4Nmh8KMIOU XDpeMiiFyT6elJdjIjIKKlTa1IcszmT+oJEF0= Received: by 10.204.120.130 with SMTP id d2mr4045865bkr.214.1290981457751; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 13:57:37 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.77.201 with HTTP; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 13:57:17 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <006201cb8f2f$0866c9a0$19345ce0$@thetaphi.de> References: <006201cb8f2f$0866c9a0$19345ce0$@thetaphi.de> From: Robert Muir Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 16:57:17 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Lucene 3.0.3 and 2.9.4 artifacts (take 2) To: general@lucene.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1. No test problems, no compile warnings, no javadocs warnings, changes.txt looks good on both candidates. On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 2:04 PM, Uwe Schindler wrote: > Hi all Lucene Java committers and PMC, > > As Robert found some test problems in the last release artifacts, I have > posted a release candidate for both Apache Lucene Java 2.9.4 and > 3.0.3 (which both have the same bug fix level, functionality and release > announcement), built from revision 1039909 of the corresponding branches. > > Thanks for all your help! Please test them and give your votes, the > scheduled release date for both versions will be Friday, December 3th, 20= 10. > Only votes from the Lucene PMC are binding, but everyone is welcome to ch= eck > the release candidate and voice their approval or disapproval. The vote > passes if at least three binding +1 votes are cast. > > We planned the parallel release with one announcement because of their > parallel development / bug fix level to emphasize that they are equal exc= ept > deprecation removal and Java 5 since major version 3. I will post the > possible release announcement soon for corrections. > > Artifacts (incl. Maven) and Changes.txt can be found here: > http://s.apache.org/fL > > Attached you will also find a cool ANT build script that can patch a Solr > 1.4.1 distribution to use Lucene 2.9.4: > > - Extract the binary Lucene distribution artifact: lucene-2.9.4.zip (not > -src.zip a svn checkout!) > - Place the attached patch-solr.xml file in the extracted Lucene > distribution's root folder > - Execute: > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0ant -f patch-solr.xml -Dsolr.dir=3D/path/to/So= lr-1.4.1-distibution > > After that you have a patched Solr, with updated lib/ folder and updated = war > files in dist/ and example/webapps/. > > ----- > Uwe Schindler > H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen > http://www.thetaphi.de > eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de > > >