Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 43529 invoked from network); 28 Nov 2010 15:05:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Nov 2010 15:05:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 24584 invoked by uid 500); 28 Nov 2010 15:05:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-general-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 24504 invoked by uid 500); 28 Nov 2010 15:05:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 24496 invoked by uid 99); 28 Nov 2010 15:05:13 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 15:05:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of rcmuir@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.48] (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.214.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 15:05:05 +0000 Received: by bwz9 with SMTP id 9so3563548bwz.35 for ; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 07:04:45 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=XC/zhE4mflpz5RoTB5gFH8f+9c0d6MlCWSA9hbn6u0s=; b=ToCNv4yCwElF9bU7eXKXjy5XkSlBxKhGE6NSHUptKuAqiqna3tZrQQt604PPFFom9N 5v+RGIn66G9NA5UaiHmVv85G0qp+rmyr4JHN8IgBQGW7/psgS3YeXXDMZB4/hdub1nzU UuwkOeTw4tDhqK0uXwIgj9721bq5EXCO+3krs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=pMNJVItqogqHWGfF3JqNYDSoIrWdjfNdc66hhIF/4375LNJkHbkS4C21XjESwFMvO8 XmZ0qDeZOP2zUlz/XOkcH3CuXEX2cWg1Mz1P4wxvMgEb2lqAgypBAaZFrhex0lE9k4Na XuOQvnsRi8Q2lTfVVLG/R0oqA7g+ldU2qEFMM= Received: by 10.204.116.4 with SMTP id k4mr3790041bkq.187.1290956685016; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 07:04:45 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.77.201 with HTTP; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 07:04:24 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <002801cb8f0c$1f72fc40$5e58f4c0$@thetaphi.de> References: <001001cb8e97$57538b90$05faa2b0$@thetaphi.de> <002101cb8f0a$a9c228f0$fd467ad0$@thetaphi.de> <002801cb8f0c$1f72fc40$5e58f4c0$@thetaphi.de> From: Robert Muir Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 10:04:24 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Lucene 3.0.3 and 2.9.4 artifacts (take 1) To: general@lucene.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 9:54 AM, Uwe Schindler wrote: > > Indeed? I have never seen a commit message on Solr 1.4 branch. Or does those mails don't go to the current commit list? It seems these commits still go to solr-commits@lucene.apache.org, since the branch is still in the old location, not under /dev. I just looked and there are a few bugfixes sitting there. Additionally, reviewing bugfixes committed to 3.x to see if the should be backported like we did for this lucene release might find a few more candidates. > Nevertheless, the patch script does its work even when patching solr svn checkout, collecting the jar files is a pain *g* :-) well this is a good test of the lucene release, and an option instead of doing a full bugfix release of solr (the script looks good to me), i was just mentioning that solr does have its own bugfixes too.