Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 28781 invoked from network); 3 Nov 2010 12:40:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 3 Nov 2010 12:40:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 22276 invoked by uid 500); 3 Nov 2010 12:41:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-general-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 22222 invoked by uid 500); 3 Nov 2010 12:41:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 22214 invoked by uid 99); 3 Nov 2010 12:41:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 12:41:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of rcmuir@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.48] (HELO mail-fx0-f48.google.com) (209.85.161.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 12:41:07 +0000 Received: by fxm7 with SMTP id 7so397211fxm.35 for ; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 05:40:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=CblPCtAhIuep6RLiMaLws7rXdypBq73YzPbp40BeQ8s=; b=nd2xbyobIJCD7zvCnGR4ZHXRD/T5aqui6GuSRqk21bXw8cih80ldGE76hiPbvKUNTz TXYxePL9eFEUVyHpfcMb6uIweQJA2iZFAjuhSvQxC/OtrfGtpA433L0+aQAtrQUl1gdf BfkJRUxdmr8rTcYW87CwvTOsNsPz9wsFTdPQA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=LbtsQPkRbpLNi7dzC6kkhLJc7fDtzwK9eaiuBuUzXnJqrtajF7u+HdxjJwafqP3d97 SRJKLO/DY+kk9rw4xN4IP1dzBR1ZRXf90HIRLEimKVlEbKSaX7cDu+aUv/M8LIbMzFek MN5dY/N23ccb485T7ST975yO4ZQ5CD2uZ0mHg= Received: by 10.223.118.211 with SMTP id w19mr11836316faq.14.1288788046142; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 05:40:46 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.78.202 with HTTP; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 05:40:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <083FF0A3-CE11-4EE2-8EBA-1D62CE95CC35@apache.org> <000001cb7889$71ec10e0$55c432a0$@com> <0ED25B9E-5434-4C7A-B6A4-40E78A4276FA@apache.org> <3FCEA726F7253C4FAC829227E83E051401728EDDB7@USPHO-MXVS05.amer.thermo.com> <85F733AB-02CA-4DF9-B7DB-82B4DA358D47@apache.org> <6BF736603DBFD04FB97F35886CABF5B98A9C7848@CATINEXC04.catapultsystems.com> <9E429443-C912-4A4B-B06F-A2807E4EA76F@apache.org> From: Robert Muir Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2010 08:40:24 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Lucene.NET Community Status To: general@lucene.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 6:40 AM, Simone Chiaretta wrote: > that cannot be even summed up in an email, then I don't think its really a > lot of advantages for the project. > > Except for the name, personally I don't see any other reason for really > wanting to stay inside the ASF. > Going somewhere else isn't gonna fix your problem, because Apache isn't the cause. Lucene.NET development is completely dead: if it was at codeplex/google code/sourceforge it would just continue to rot, rather than someone trying to do something about it.