lucene-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Grant Ingersoll <gsing...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Lucene Java -> Lucene Core
Date Mon, 08 Nov 2010 17:37:54 GMT

On Nov 8, 2010, at 12:18 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:

> One name that might work is "Lucene".

Yeah, but then you have Lucene/Lucene as in the TLP being named Lucene.  

> 
> Let that mean the java version and slightly ambiguously refer to the entire
> project depending on context.  Then use qualifiers
> for things like lucene.net.
> 
> I would contend that we already have this usage and going with something
> else will be a difficult uphill task.
> 
> On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 9:10 AM, Steven A Rowe <sarowe@syr.edu> wrote:
> 
>> One small concern: "core" already means something within Lucene Java.
>> 
>> So we'd have Lucene Core core (as opposed to contrib).

Kind of, there isn't actually anything named core other than the jar, and I think that actually
makes sense given the proposed change.  It is the core and that aligns with the would be project
name.  


-Grant
Mime
View raw message