lucene-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Steven A Rowe <sar...@syr.edu>
Subject RE: [DISCUSS] Lucene Java -> Lucene Core
Date Mon, 08 Nov 2010 18:19:51 GMT
On 11/08/2010 at 12:46 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> and small things don't grow well in the shade.

Blanket statements are always wrong, e.g.:

	http://issuu.com/bbmackey/docs/ebookmoss

Steve

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ted Dunning [mailto:ted.dunning@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, November 08, 2010 12:46 PM
> To: general@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Lucene Java -> Lucene Core
> 
> Yep.
> 
> I see that as a virtue rather than a defect.  Truth in labeling and such.
> 
> A big part of the problem with lucene.net is that the Lucene TLP is
> essentially a Lucene-for-Java project
> and small things don't grow well in the shade.
> 
> On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 9:37 AM, Grant Ingersoll <gsingers@apache.org>
> wrote:
> 
> > On Nov 8, 2010, at 12:18 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> >
> > > One name that might work is "Lucene".
> >
> > Yeah, but then you have Lucene/Lucene as in the TLP being named Lucene.
> >
Mime
View raw message