lucene-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Steven A Rowe <>
Subject RE: [DISCUSS] Lucene Java -> Lucene Core
Date Mon, 08 Nov 2010 17:10:56 GMT
One small concern: "core" already means something within Lucene Java.

So we'd have Lucene Core core (as opposed to contrib).

Should cores have cores?  It seems against the will of universe somehow.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Grant Ingersoll []
> Sent: Monday, November 08, 2010 10:58 AM
> To: general list
> Subject: [DISCUSS] Lucene Java -> Lucene Core
> Hi Luceneers, esp. PMC and Committers,
> I'm in the process of reviewing our branding per the Trademarks committee
> sending out requirements.   So, expect to see some changes to the website
> and logos in the coming days as well as, potentially, a request for help.
> Per the Branding Requirements at
>, I think we should stop
> calling our core Java implementation Lucene Java, since Java is an Oracle
> TM, and move to simply calling it Lucene Core or Lucene for Java.
> I'm inclined to call it Lucene Core or (Core, for short).  Most of us just
> call it Lucene anyway, so the Core part really is only for navigation
> purposes on the website.
> I'd like to discuss this for a day or two and then call a vote.
> Thoughts?
> -Grant
View raw message