lucene-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Digy" <digyd...@gmail.com>
Subject RE: Lucene.NET Community Status
Date Sat, 30 Oct 2010 23:23:20 GMT
Hi Grant, George and all Lucene.Net community,

As a Lucene.Net committer, I didn't quit the project, but stopped
deliberately answering the questions and making commits to show no other
committers were willing to keep the project alive.(like Apache Board Report.
The only response from commiters was after Grant's mail.)

So, If there are people willing to keep Lucene.Net alive, I am in, but I
don't want to be the only one.

DIGY



-----Original Message-----
From: Grant Ingersoll [mailto:gsingers@apache.org] 
Sent: Friday, October 29, 2010 11:48 PM
To: lucene-net-user@lucene.apache.org
Cc: Lucene mailing list; lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Lucene.NET Community Status

FYI: This message was sent to the lucene-net-dev@lucene.a.o list on Oct. 25
and elicited zero replies.  I am sending it here in the hopes that some of
you will step forward and either bring this project back to life via going
back to the Incubator or we put it in the Apache Attic and someone can take
and maintain it somewhere else under a different name per the terms of the
Apache License.

---
Hi .Netters,

The Lucene PMC would like to ask everyone involved with .NET if they might
chime in on the status of this project.  There hasn't been a commit since
July 2010 (and that one was trivial and there were only 2 in June) and there
seems to be very little activity on the dev mailing list.  There also has
not been a release in a long time.  This was brought up at the last Lucene
Board Report and it doesn't appear that there has been any action since.   A
community should be able to withstand the loss of a single committer, but
here it appears that there are no longer any committers willing to work on
the project.

In order to remedy the situation, we would like the following things to be
done:
1.  The community needs to show some (sustained) life.  Not just in code,
but in discussion of the project's future, etc.  We would expect the
committers to take a leadership role here.
2. The community needs to do a real release that is voted on by the PMC.
3. The webpage needs to be updated to reflect that those previous "source"
releases are not real releases and should be taken down.  Likewise, the news
section should not tout these non-releases as releases.  The website should
also meet the PMC Branding guidelines recently sent out.
4. Identify some new blood for contributors/committers.  Or the current
committers need to step up more and take a lead role in the community.

We would like to see action on all of these things by the end of this year.
If they can't be met, there will be one of the following actions:
1. Go back into Incubation
2. Go into the Apache Attic.  If someone wants to take the code base and
fork it out as a project somewhere else under a new name that does not use
the Lucene trademark name (since that is owned by the ASF) than that is
perfectly acceptable under the Apache license.  

If the conditions can be met, we think that the project should spin itself
out as its own Top Level ASF project with its own PMC so that its future
direction can be set by the stakeholders of the project and not by the
larger Lucene project as a whole.

Sincerely,
Grant Ingersoll
On behalf of the Lucene PMC=


Mime
View raw message