Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 24854 invoked from network); 7 Jun 2010 20:33:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 7 Jun 2010 20:33:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 92905 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2010 20:33:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-general-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 92869 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2010 20:33:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 92859 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jun 2010 20:33:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Jun 2010 20:33:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [66.159.224.220] (HELO ovaltofu.org) (66.159.224.220) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Jun 2010 20:33:02 +0000 Received: from [192.168.0.12] ([192.168.0.12]) (authenticated bits=0) by ovaltofu.org (8.14.3/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o57KWQg6015155 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 7 Jun 2010 13:32:37 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2010 13:32:31 -0700 (PDT) From: Andi Vajda X-X-Sender: vajda@yuzu.local Reply-To: Andi Vajda To: general@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Lucene Java 2.9.3 and 3.0.2 artifacts to be released In-Reply-To: <002101cb0654$feec9c50$fcc5d4f0$@thetaphi.de> Message-ID: References: <002101cb0654$feec9c50$fcc5d4f0$@thetaphi.de> User-Agent: Alpine 2.01 (OSX 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Mon, 7 Jun 2010, Uwe Schindler wrote: > I have posted a release candidate for both Lucene Java 2.9.3 and 3.0.2 > (which both have the same bug fix level, functionality and release > announcement), build from revision 951790 of the corresponding branches. > Thanks for all your help! Please test them and give your votes, the > scheduled release date for both versions is Friday, June 18th, 2010. Only > votes from Lucene PMC are binding, but everyone is welcome to check the > release candidate and voice their approval or disapproval. The vote passes > if at least three binding +1 votes are cast. > > We planned the parallel release with one announcement because of their > parallel development / bug fix level to emphasize that they are equal except > deprecation removal and Java 5 since major version 3. I will post the > possible release announcement soon for corrections. > > Artifacts can be found at: > http://people.apache.org/~uschindler/staging-area/lucene-2.9.3-3.0.2-take1-r > ev951790/ PyLucene 2.9.3 and 3.0.2 built from their respective Lucene artifacts pass all tests. +1 Andi..