I ran the tests on my computer and with 2.9.3 I got a failure, which i cannot reproduce: [junit] Testsuite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestThreadedOptimize [junit] Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 9,017 sec [junit] [junit] ------------- Standard Output --------------- [junit] Thread-45: hit exception [junit] java.lang.AssertionError [junit] at org.apache.lucene.index.CompoundFileWriter.close(CompoundFileWriter.java:195 ) [junit] at org.apache.lucene.index.DocumentsWriter.createCompoundFile(DocumentsWriter.j ava:672) [junit] at org.apache.lucene.index.IndexWriter.doFlushInternal(IndexWriter.java:4418) [junit] at org.apache.lucene.index.IndexWriter.doFlush(IndexWriter.java:4264) [junit] at org.apache.lucene.index.IndexWriter.flush(IndexWriter.java:4255) [junit] at org.apache.lucene.index.IndexWriter.addDocument(IndexWriter.java:2546) [junit] at org.apache.lucene.index.IndexWriter.addDocument(IndexWriter.java:2500) [junit] at org.apache.lucene.index.TestThreadedOptimize$1.run(TestThreadedOptimize.java :92) [junit] ------------- ---------------- --------------- [junit] Testcase: testThreadedOptimize(org.apache.lucene.index.TestThreadedOptimize): FAILED [junit] null [junit] junit.framework.AssertionFailedError [junit] at org.apache.lucene.index.TestThreadedOptimize.runTest(TestThreadedOptimize.ja va:113) [junit] at org.apache.lucene.index.TestThreadedOptimize.testThreadedOptimize(TestThread edOptimize.java:154) [junit] at org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase.runBare(LuceneTestCase.java:221) [junit] [junit] [junit] Test org.apache.lucene.index.TestThreadedOptimize FAILED Maybe it's just the bug in the test we already know, if this is so, we can proceed with releasing. It happened in JDK 1.4.2 when doing a test build on my windows machine of 2.9.3-src.zip. Mike, maybe it's an already fixed test-only bug (missing "volatile" on field in this test)? Uwe ----- Uwe Schindler H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen http://www.thetaphi.de eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de > -----Original Message----- > From: Uwe Schindler [mailto:uwe@thetaphi.de] > Sent: Monday, June 07, 2010 5:21 PM > To: general@lucene.apache.org > Subject: [VOTE] Apache Lucene Java 2.9.3 and 3.0.2 artifacts to be released > > Hi all, > > I have posted a release candidate for both Lucene Java 2.9.3 and 3.0.2 (which > both have the same bug fix level, functionality and release announcement), > build from revision 951790 of the corresponding branches. > Thanks for all your help! Please test them and give your votes, the scheduled > release date for both versions is Friday, June 18th, 2010. Only votes from > Lucene PMC are binding, but everyone is welcome to check the release > candidate and voice their approval or disapproval. The vote passes if at least > three binding +1 votes are cast. > > We planned the parallel release with one announcement because of their > parallel development / bug fix level to emphasize that they are equal except > deprecation removal and Java 5 since major version 3. I will post the possible > release announcement soon for corrections. > > Artifacts can be found at: > http://people.apache.org/~uschindler/staging-area/lucene-2.9.3-3.0.2- > take1-r > ev951790/ > > Changes: > http://people.apache.org/~uschindler/staging-area/lucene-2.9.3-3.0.2- > take1-r > ev951790/changes-2.9.3/Changes.html > http://people.apache.org/~uschindler/staging-area/lucene-2.9.3-3.0.2- > take1-r > ev951790/changes-2.9.3/Contrib-Changes.html > > http://people.apache.org/~uschindler/staging-area/lucene-2.9.3-3.0.2- > take1-r > ev951790/changes-3.0.2/Changes.html > http://people.apache.org/~uschindler/staging-area/lucene-2.9.3-3.0.2- > take1-r > ev951790/changes-3.0.2/Contrib-Changes.html > > Maven artifacts: > http://people.apache.org/~uschindler/staging-area/lucene-2.9.3-3.0.2- > take1-r > ev951790/maven/ > > Happy testing! > > P.S.: I already tested the latest 3.0.2 artifacts with pangaea.de :-) > > ----- > Uwe Schindler > H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen > http://www.thetaphi.de > eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de >