lucene-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mark Miller <markrmil...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Apache Lucene Java 2.9.3 and 3.0.2 artifacts to be released
Date Fri, 11 Jun 2010 11:48:35 GMT
I'd say that's a very weird type of issue to cause a respin and get  
everyone to test and vote again, but I won't say I'm against.

- Mark

http://www.lucidimagination.com (mobile)

On Jun 11, 2010, at 7:13 AM, "Uwe Schindler" <uwe@thetaphi.de> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> Simon and me decided, that we want to have LUCENE-2494 (Modify
> ParallelMultiSearcher to use a CompletionService instead of slowly  
> polling
> for results) inside Lucene Java 3.0.2. This is an significant  
> performance
> improvement. It will not go to 2.9.3, as its Java 1.5 only.
>
> I would like to respin 3.0.2, the artifacts of 2.9.3 would stay as  
> they are,
> as the vote seems completed. As the date of publishing was planned for
> Friday next week, we have enough time. It would be nice, if you  
> could test
> again, I will post new artifacts soon!
>
> Is somebody against?
>
> Uwe
>
> -----
> Uwe Schindler
> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
> http://www.thetaphi.de
> eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Michael McCandless [mailto:lucene@mikemccandless.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2010 6:44 PM
>> To: general@lucene.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Lucene Java 2.9.3 and 3.0.2 artifacts to  
>> be
>> released
>>
>> Alas, I have 4 envs (Windows Server 2003, OpenSolaris 2009.06,  
>> CentOS 5.4,
>> OS X 10.6.2, running stress tests for 4+ hours now, and I haven't  
>> hit a
> single
>> failure...
>>
>> If nobody else can repro this, I think we should not hold up the  
>> release?
>>
>> Mike
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 8:44 AM, Uwe Schindler <uwe@thetaphi.de>  
>> wrote:
>>> No idea, its NTFS on Windows 7, 64 bit, JDK 1.4.2_19-32bit. The test
>>> now works, so cannot reproduce.
>>>
>>> Not idea what we should do!
>>>
>>> -----
>>> Uwe Schindler
>>> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
>>> http://www.thetaphi.de
>>> eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de
>>>
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Michael McCandless [mailto:lucene@mikemccandless.com]
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2010 2:36 PM
>>>> To: general@lucene.apache.org
>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Lucene Java 2.9.3 and 3.0.2 artifacts to
>>>> be released
>>>>
>>>> This looks like something new to me (doesn't ring a bell).
>>>>
>>>> It looks odd -- the assertion that's tripping would seem to  
>>>> indicate
>>>> that
>>> a file
>>>> that we are copying into a CFS file (after flushing) is still
>>>> changing
>>> while we
>>>> are copying, which is not good.  All files should be closed  
>>>> before we
>>> build the
>>>> CFS.  Strange... was this just a local hard drive / NTFS file  
>>>> system,
> Uwe?
>>>>
>>>> I also can't repro, so far -- I have a while(1) stress test running
>>>> on
>>> OpenSolaris
>>>> and Windows Server 2003, but no failures yet...
>>>>
>>>> Can anyone else get this test to fail?
>>>>
>>>> Mike
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 7:54 AM, Uwe Schindler <uwe@thetaphi.de>
>> wrote:
>>>>> I ran the tests on my computer and with 2.9.3 I got a failure,
>>>>> which i cannot reproduce:
>>>>>
>>>>>    [junit] Testsuite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestThreadedOptimize
>>>>>    [junit] Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Time elapsed:
>>>>> 9,017 sec
>>>>>    [junit]
>>>>>    [junit] ------------- Standard Output ---------------
>>>>>    [junit] Thread-45: hit exception
>>>>>    [junit] java.lang.AssertionError
>>>>>    [junit]     at
>>>>>
>>>>
>> org.apache.lucene.index.CompoundFileWriter.close(CompoundFileWriter.j
>>>> a
>>>>> va:195
>>>>> )
>>>>>    [junit]     at
>>>>>
>>>>
>> org.apache.lucene.index.DocumentsWriter.createCompoundFile(Document
>>>> sWr
>>>>> iter.j
>>>>> ava:672)
>>>>>    [junit]     at
>>>>> org.apache.lucene.index.IndexWriter.doFlushInternal 
>>>>> (IndexWriter.jav
>>>>> a:4
>>>>> 418)
>>>>>    [junit]     at
>>>>> org.apache.lucene.index.IndexWriter.doFlush(IndexWriter.java:4264)
>>>>>    [junit]     at
>>>>> org.apache.lucene.index.IndexWriter.flush(IndexWriter.java:4255)
>>>>>    [junit]     at
>>>>>
>>>>
>> org.apache.lucene.index.IndexWriter.addDocument(IndexWriter.java:2546
>>>> )
>>>>>    [junit]     at
>>>>>
>>>>
>> org.apache.lucene.index.IndexWriter.addDocument(IndexWriter.java:2500
>>>> )
>>>>>    [junit]     at
>>>>>
>>>>
>> org.apache.lucene.index.TestThreadedOptimize$1.run(TestThreadedOptimi
>>>> z
>>>>> e.java
>>>>> :92)
>>>>>    [junit] ------------- ---------------- ---------------
>>>>>    [junit] Testcase:
>>>>>
>> testThreadedOptimize(org.apache.lucene.index.TestThreadedOptimize):
>>>>> FAILED
>>>>>    [junit] null
>>>>>    [junit] junit.framework.AssertionFailedError
>>>>>    [junit]     at
>>>>>
>>>>
>> org.apache.lucene.index.TestThreadedOptimize.runTest(TestThreadedOpti
>>>> m
>>>>> ize.ja
>>>>> va:113)
>>>>>    [junit]     at
>>>>>
>>>>
>> org.apache.lucene.index.TestThreadedOptimize.testThreadedOptimize(Tes
>>>> t
>>>>> Thread
>>>>> edOptimize.java:154)
>>>>>    [junit]     at
>>>>> org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase.runBare 
>>>>> (LuceneTestCase.java:2
>>>>> 21)
>>>>>    [junit]
>>>>>    [junit]
>>>>>    [junit] Test org.apache.lucene.index.TestThreadedOptimize  
>>>>> FAILED
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Maybe it's just the bug in the test we already know, if this is  
>>>>> so,
>>>>> we can proceed with releasing. It happened in JDK 1.4.2 when doing
>>>>> a test build on my windows machine of 2.9.3-src.zip.
>>>>>
>>>>> Mike, maybe it's an already fixed test-only bug (missing  
>>>>> "volatile"
>>>>> on field in this test)?
>>>>>
>>>>> Uwe
>>>>>
>>>>> -----
>>>>> Uwe Schindler
>>>>> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen http://www.thetaphi.de
>>>>> eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>> From: Uwe Schindler [mailto:uwe@thetaphi.de]
>>>>>> Sent: Monday, June 07, 2010 5:21 PM
>>>>>> To: general@lucene.apache.org
>>>>>> Subject: [VOTE] Apache Lucene Java 2.9.3 and 3.0.2 artifacts to 

>>>>>> be
>>>>> released
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have posted a release candidate for both Lucene Java 2.9.3 and
>>>>>> 3.0.2
>>>>> (which
>>>>>> both have the same bug fix level, functionality and release
>>>>>> announcement), build from revision 951790 of the corresponding
>>>> branches.
>>>>>> Thanks for all your help! Please test them and give your votes, 

>>>>>> the
>>>>> scheduled
>>>>>> release date for both versions is Friday, June 18th, 2010. Only
> votes
>>>>>> from Lucene PMC are binding, but everyone is welcome to check the
>>>>>> release candidate and voice their approval or disapproval. The  
>>>>>> vote
>>>>>> passes if at
>>>>> least
>>>>>> three binding +1 votes are cast.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We planned the parallel release with one announcement because of
>>>>>> their parallel development / bug fix level to emphasize that they
> are
>>>>>> equal
>>>>> except
>>>>>> deprecation removal and Java 5 since major version 3. I will post
> the
>>>>> possible
>>>>>> release announcement soon for corrections.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Artifacts can be found at:
>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~uschindler/staging-area/lucene-2.9.3-
>> 3.0.2-
>>>>>> take1-r
>>>>>> ev951790/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Changes:
>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~uschindler/staging-area/lucene-2.9.3-
>> 3.0.2-
>>>>>> take1-r
>>>>>> ev951790/changes-2.9.3/Changes.html
>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~uschindler/staging-area/lucene-2.9.3-
>> 3.0.2-
>>>>>> take1-r
>>>>>> ev951790/changes-2.9.3/Contrib-Changes.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~uschindler/staging-area/lucene-2.9.3-
>> 3.0.2-
>>>>>> take1-r
>>>>>> ev951790/changes-3.0.2/Changes.html
>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~uschindler/staging-area/lucene-2.9.3-
>> 3.0.2-
>>>>>> take1-r
>>>>>> ev951790/changes-3.0.2/Contrib-Changes.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Maven artifacts:
>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~uschindler/staging-area/lucene-2.9.3-
>> 3.0.2-
>>>>>> take1-r
>>>>>> ev951790/maven/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Happy testing!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> P.S.: I already tested the latest 3.0.2 artifacts with pangaea.de
> :-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -----
>>>>>> Uwe Schindler
>>>>>> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
>>>>>> http://www.thetaphi.de
>>>>>> eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>

Mime
View raw message