lucene-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Uwe Schindler" <...@thetaphi.de>
Subject RE: [VOTE] Apache Lucene Java 2.9.3 and 3.0.2 artifacts to be released
Date Tue, 08 Jun 2010 12:44:01 GMT
No idea, its NTFS on Windows 7, 64 bit, JDK 1.4.2_19-32bit. The test now
works, so cannot reproduce.

Not idea what we should do!

-----
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael McCandless [mailto:lucene@mikemccandless.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2010 2:36 PM
> To: general@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Lucene Java 2.9.3 and 3.0.2 artifacts to be
> released
> 
> This looks like something new to me (doesn't ring a bell).
> 
> It looks odd -- the assertion that's tripping would seem to indicate that
a file
> that we are copying into a CFS file (after flushing) is still changing
while we
> are copying, which is not good.  All files should be closed before we
build the
> CFS.  Strange... was this just a local hard drive / NTFS file system, Uwe?
> 
> I also can't repro, so far -- I have a while(1) stress test running on
OpenSolaris
> and Windows Server 2003, but no failures yet...
> 
> Can anyone else get this test to fail?
> 
> Mike
> 
> On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 7:54 AM, Uwe Schindler <uwe@thetaphi.de> wrote:
> > I ran the tests on my computer and with 2.9.3 I got a failure, which i
> > cannot reproduce:
> >
> >    [junit] Testsuite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestThreadedOptimize
> >    [junit] Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 9,017
> > sec
> >    [junit]
> >    [junit] ------------- Standard Output ---------------
> >    [junit] Thread-45: hit exception
> >    [junit] java.lang.AssertionError
> >    [junit]     at
> >
> org.apache.lucene.index.CompoundFileWriter.close(CompoundFileWriter.ja
> > va:195
> > )
> >    [junit]     at
> >
> org.apache.lucene.index.DocumentsWriter.createCompoundFile(Document
> sWr
> > iter.j
> > ava:672)
> >    [junit]     at
> > org.apache.lucene.index.IndexWriter.doFlushInternal(IndexWriter.java:4
> > 418)
> >    [junit]     at
> > org.apache.lucene.index.IndexWriter.doFlush(IndexWriter.java:4264)
> >    [junit]     at
> > org.apache.lucene.index.IndexWriter.flush(IndexWriter.java:4255)
> >    [junit]     at
> >
> org.apache.lucene.index.IndexWriter.addDocument(IndexWriter.java:2546)
> >    [junit]     at
> >
> org.apache.lucene.index.IndexWriter.addDocument(IndexWriter.java:2500)
> >    [junit]     at
> >
> org.apache.lucene.index.TestThreadedOptimize$1.run(TestThreadedOptimi
> z
> > e.java
> > :92)
> >    [junit] ------------- ---------------- ---------------
> >    [junit] Testcase:
> > testThreadedOptimize(org.apache.lucene.index.TestThreadedOptimize):
> > FAILED
> >    [junit] null
> >    [junit] junit.framework.AssertionFailedError
> >    [junit]     at
> >
> org.apache.lucene.index.TestThreadedOptimize.runTest(TestThreadedOpti
> m
> > ize.ja
> > va:113)
> >    [junit]     at
> >
> org.apache.lucene.index.TestThreadedOptimize.testThreadedOptimize(Test
> > Thread
> > edOptimize.java:154)
> >    [junit]     at
> > org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase.runBare(LuceneTestCase.java:221)
> >    [junit]
> >    [junit]
> >    [junit] Test org.apache.lucene.index.TestThreadedOptimize FAILED
> >
> >
> > Maybe it's just the bug in the test we already know, if this is so, we
> > can proceed with releasing. It happened in JDK 1.4.2 when doing a test
> > build on my windows machine of 2.9.3-src.zip.
> >
> > Mike, maybe it's an already fixed test-only bug (missing "volatile" on
> > field in this test)?
> >
> > Uwe
> >
> > -----
> > Uwe Schindler
> > H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
> > http://www.thetaphi.de
> > eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Uwe Schindler [mailto:uwe@thetaphi.de]
> >> Sent: Monday, June 07, 2010 5:21 PM
> >> To: general@lucene.apache.org
> >> Subject: [VOTE] Apache Lucene Java 2.9.3 and 3.0.2 artifacts to be
> > released
> >>
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> I have posted a release candidate for both Lucene Java 2.9.3 and
> >> 3.0.2
> > (which
> >> both have the same bug fix level, functionality and release
> >> announcement), build from revision 951790 of the corresponding
> branches.
> >> Thanks for all your help! Please test them and give your votes, the
> > scheduled
> >> release date for both versions is Friday, June 18th, 2010. Only votes
> >> from Lucene PMC are binding, but everyone is welcome to check the
> >> release candidate and voice their approval or disapproval. The vote
> >> passes if at
> > least
> >> three binding +1 votes are cast.
> >>
> >> We planned the parallel release with one announcement because of
> >> their parallel development / bug fix level to emphasize that they are
> >> equal
> > except
> >> deprecation removal and Java 5 since major version 3. I will post the
> > possible
> >> release announcement soon for corrections.
> >>
> >> Artifacts can be found at:
> >> http://people.apache.org/~uschindler/staging-area/lucene-2.9.3-3.0.2-
> >> take1-r
> >> ev951790/
> >>
> >> Changes:
> >> http://people.apache.org/~uschindler/staging-area/lucene-2.9.3-3.0.2-
> >> take1-r
> >> ev951790/changes-2.9.3/Changes.html
> >> http://people.apache.org/~uschindler/staging-area/lucene-2.9.3-3.0.2-
> >> take1-r
> >> ev951790/changes-2.9.3/Contrib-Changes.html
> >>
> >> http://people.apache.org/~uschindler/staging-area/lucene-2.9.3-3.0.2-
> >> take1-r
> >> ev951790/changes-3.0.2/Changes.html
> >> http://people.apache.org/~uschindler/staging-area/lucene-2.9.3-3.0.2-
> >> take1-r
> >> ev951790/changes-3.0.2/Contrib-Changes.html
> >>
> >> Maven artifacts:
> >> http://people.apache.org/~uschindler/staging-area/lucene-2.9.3-3.0.2-
> >> take1-r
> >> ev951790/maven/
> >>
> >> Happy testing!
> >>
> >> P.S.: I already tested the latest 3.0.2 artifacts with pangaea.de :-)
> >>
> >> -----
> >> Uwe Schindler
> >> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
> >> http://www.thetaphi.de
> >> eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de
> >>
> >
> >
> >


Mime
View raw message