lucene-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Uwe Schindler" <...@thetaphi.de>
Subject RE: [VOTE] Apache Lucene Java 2.9.3 and 3.0.2 artifacts to be released
Date Fri, 11 Jun 2010 12:17:53 GMT
This is why I ask first.

-----
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Miller [mailto:markrmiller@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, June 11, 2010 1:49 PM
> To: general@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Lucene Java 2.9.3 and 3.0.2 artifacts to be
> released
> 
> I'd say that's a very weird type of issue to cause a respin and get
everyone to
> test and vote again, but I won't say I'm against.
> 
> - Mark
> 
> http://www.lucidimagination.com (mobile)
> 
> On Jun 11, 2010, at 7:13 AM, "Uwe Schindler" <uwe@thetaphi.de> wrote:
> 
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Simon and me decided, that we want to have LUCENE-2494 (Modify
> > ParallelMultiSearcher to use a CompletionService instead of slowly
> > polling for results) inside Lucene Java 3.0.2. This is an significant
> > performance improvement. It will not go to 2.9.3, as its Java 1.5
> > only.
> >
> > I would like to respin 3.0.2, the artifacts of 2.9.3 would stay as
> > they are, as the vote seems completed. As the date of publishing was
> > planned for Friday next week, we have enough time. It would be nice,
> > if you could test again, I will post new artifacts soon!
> >
> > Is somebody against?
> >
> > Uwe
> >
> > -----
> > Uwe Schindler
> > H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
> > http://www.thetaphi.de
> > eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Michael McCandless [mailto:lucene@mikemccandless.com]
> >> Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2010 6:44 PM
> >> To: general@lucene.apache.org
> >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Lucene Java 2.9.3 and 3.0.2 artifacts to
> >> be released
> >>
> >> Alas, I have 4 envs (Windows Server 2003, OpenSolaris 2009.06, CentOS
> >> 5.4, OS X 10.6.2, running stress tests for 4+ hours now, and I
> >> haven't hit a
> > single
> >> failure...
> >>
> >> If nobody else can repro this, I think we should not hold up the
> >> release?
> >>
> >> Mike
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 8:44 AM, Uwe Schindler <uwe@thetaphi.de>
> >> wrote:
> >>> No idea, its NTFS on Windows 7, 64 bit, JDK 1.4.2_19-32bit. The test
> >>> now works, so cannot reproduce.
> >>>
> >>> Not idea what we should do!
> >>>
> >>> -----
> >>> Uwe Schindler
> >>> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen http://www.thetaphi.de
> >>> eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>> From: Michael McCandless [mailto:lucene@mikemccandless.com]
> >>>> Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2010 2:36 PM
> >>>> To: general@lucene.apache.org
> >>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Lucene Java 2.9.3 and 3.0.2 artifacts to
> >>>> be released
> >>>>
> >>>> This looks like something new to me (doesn't ring a bell).
> >>>>
> >>>> It looks odd -- the assertion that's tripping would seem to
> >>>> indicate
> >>>> that
> >>> a file
> >>>> that we are copying into a CFS file (after flushing) is still
> >>>> changing
> >>> while we
> >>>> are copying, which is not good.  All files should be closed
> >>>> before we
> >>> build the
> >>>> CFS.  Strange... was this just a local hard drive / NTFS file
> >>>> system,
> > Uwe?
> >>>>
> >>>> I also can't repro, so far -- I have a while(1) stress test running
> >>>> on
> >>> OpenSolaris
> >>>> and Windows Server 2003, but no failures yet...
> >>>>
> >>>> Can anyone else get this test to fail?
> >>>>
> >>>> Mike
> >>>>
> >>>> On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 7:54 AM, Uwe Schindler <uwe@thetaphi.de>
> >> wrote:
> >>>>> I ran the tests on my computer and with 2.9.3 I got a failure,
> >>>>> which i cannot reproduce:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>    [junit] Testsuite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestThreadedOptimize
> >>>>>    [junit] Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Time elapsed:
> >>>>> 9,017 sec
> >>>>>    [junit]
> >>>>>    [junit] ------------- Standard Output ---------------
> >>>>>    [junit] Thread-45: hit exception
> >>>>>    [junit] java.lang.AssertionError
> >>>>>    [junit]     at
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> org.apache.lucene.index.CompoundFileWriter.close(CompoundFileWriter.j
> >>>> a
> >>>>> va:195
> >>>>> )
> >>>>>    [junit]     at
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> org.apache.lucene.index.DocumentsWriter.createCompoundFile(Document
> >>>> sWr
> >>>>> iter.j
> >>>>> ava:672)
> >>>>>    [junit]     at
> >>>>> org.apache.lucene.index.IndexWriter.doFlushInternal
> >>>>> (IndexWriter.jav
> >>>>> a:4
> >>>>> 418)
> >>>>>    [junit]     at
> >>>>> org.apache.lucene.index.IndexWriter.doFlush(IndexWriter.java:4264)
> >>>>>    [junit]     at
> >>>>> org.apache.lucene.index.IndexWriter.flush(IndexWriter.java:4255)
> >>>>>    [junit]     at
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> org.apache.lucene.index.IndexWriter.addDocument(IndexWriter.java:2546
> >>>> )
> >>>>>    [junit]     at
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> org.apache.lucene.index.IndexWriter.addDocument(IndexWriter.java:2500
> >>>> )
> >>>>>    [junit]     at
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> org.apache.lucene.index.TestThreadedOptimize$1.run(TestThreadedOptimi
> >>>> z
> >>>>> e.java
> >>>>> :92)
> >>>>>    [junit] ------------- ---------------- ---------------
> >>>>>    [junit] Testcase:
> >>>>>
> >> testThreadedOptimize(org.apache.lucene.index.TestThreadedOptimize):
> >>>>> FAILED
> >>>>>    [junit] null
> >>>>>    [junit] junit.framework.AssertionFailedError
> >>>>>    [junit]     at
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> org.apache.lucene.index.TestThreadedOptimize.runTest(TestThreadedOpti
> >>>> m
> >>>>> ize.ja
> >>>>> va:113)
> >>>>>    [junit]     at
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> org.apache.lucene.index.TestThreadedOptimize.testThreadedOptimize(Tes
> >>>> t
> >>>>> Thread
> >>>>> edOptimize.java:154)
> >>>>>    [junit]     at
> >>>>> org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase.runBare
> >>>>> (LuceneTestCase.java:2
> >>>>> 21)
> >>>>>    [junit]
> >>>>>    [junit]
> >>>>>    [junit] Test org.apache.lucene.index.TestThreadedOptimize
> >>>>> FAILED
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Maybe it's just the bug in the test we already know, if this is
> >>>>> so,
> >>>>> we can proceed with releasing. It happened in JDK 1.4.2 when doing
> >>>>> a test build on my windows machine of 2.9.3-src.zip.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Mike, maybe it's an already fixed test-only bug (missing
> >>>>> "volatile"
> >>>>> on field in this test)?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Uwe
> >>>>>
> >>>>> -----
> >>>>> Uwe Schindler
> >>>>> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen http://www.thetaphi.de
> >>>>> eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>>>> From: Uwe Schindler [mailto:uwe@thetaphi.de]
> >>>>>> Sent: Monday, June 07, 2010 5:21 PM
> >>>>>> To: general@lucene.apache.org
> >>>>>> Subject: [VOTE] Apache Lucene Java 2.9.3 and 3.0.2 artifacts
to
> >>>>>> be
> >>>>> released
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Hi all,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I have posted a release candidate for both Lucene Java 2.9.3
and
> >>>>>> 3.0.2
> >>>>> (which
> >>>>>> both have the same bug fix level, functionality and release
> >>>>>> announcement), build from revision 951790 of the corresponding
> >>>> branches.
> >>>>>> Thanks for all your help! Please test them and give your votes,
> >>>>>> the
> >>>>> scheduled
> >>>>>> release date for both versions is Friday, June 18th, 2010. Only
> > votes
> >>>>>> from Lucene PMC are binding, but everyone is welcome to check
the
> >>>>>> release candidate and voice their approval or disapproval. The
> >>>>>> vote
> >>>>>> passes if at
> >>>>> least
> >>>>>> three binding +1 votes are cast.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> We planned the parallel release with one announcement because
of
> >>>>>> their parallel development / bug fix level to emphasize that
they
> > are
> >>>>>> equal
> >>>>> except
> >>>>>> deprecation removal and Java 5 since major version 3. I will
post
> > the
> >>>>> possible
> >>>>>> release announcement soon for corrections.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Artifacts can be found at:
> >>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~uschindler/staging-area/lucene-2.9.3-
> >> 3.0.2-
> >>>>>> take1-r
> >>>>>> ev951790/
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Changes:
> >>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~uschindler/staging-area/lucene-2.9.3-
> >> 3.0.2-
> >>>>>> take1-r
> >>>>>> ev951790/changes-2.9.3/Changes.html
> >>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~uschindler/staging-area/lucene-2.9.3-
> >> 3.0.2-
> >>>>>> take1-r
> >>>>>> ev951790/changes-2.9.3/Contrib-Changes.html
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~uschindler/staging-area/lucene-2.9.3-
> >> 3.0.2-
> >>>>>> take1-r
> >>>>>> ev951790/changes-3.0.2/Changes.html
> >>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~uschindler/staging-area/lucene-2.9.3-
> >> 3.0.2-
> >>>>>> take1-r
> >>>>>> ev951790/changes-3.0.2/Contrib-Changes.html
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Maven artifacts:
> >>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~uschindler/staging-area/lucene-2.9.3-
> >> 3.0.2-
> >>>>>> take1-r
> >>>>>> ev951790/maven/
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Happy testing!
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> P.S.: I already tested the latest 3.0.2 artifacts with pangaea.de
> > :-)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> -----
> >>>>>> Uwe Schindler
> >>>>>> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
> >>>>>> http://www.thetaphi.de
> >>>>>> eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >


Mime
View raw message