Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 83145 invoked from network); 27 Apr 2010 10:19:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 27 Apr 2010 10:19:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 63760 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2010 10:19:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-general-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 63557 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2010 10:19:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 63549 invoked by uid 99); 27 Apr 2010 10:19:51 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 10:19:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.3 required=10.0 tests=AWL,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [72.167.82.88] (HELO p3plsmtpa01-08.prod.phx3.secureserver.net) (72.167.82.88) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 10:19:44 +0000 Received: (qmail 1835 invoked from network); 27 Apr 2010 10:19:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (81.219.54.251) by p3plsmtpa01-08.prod.phx3.secureserver.net (72.167.82.88) with ESMTP; 27 Apr 2010 10:19:20 -0000 Message-ID: <4BD6BA24.1020707@getopt.org> Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 12:19:16 +0200 From: Andrzej Bialecki User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Thunderbird/3.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Nutch 1.1 Release Candidate #2 References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 2010-04-27 07:30, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote: > Ehrm, well OK, I technically started the 1.1 release VOTE (for rc #1) > while in Lucene, so I thought that even voting on an rc#2 within that > same 1.1 release counted as "same thread", but I suppose I'm just > debating semantics. > > In the end, it's probably simpler to be on the Nutch PMC anyways. > We're in the process of moving - we'll continue that and the move > forward with 1.1 rc #2 in Nutch-ville. In the meantime we have discovered some issues with the rc2, so no matter where I sit I would've given it -1 anyway ... so let's leave the finer points of this situation to lawyers :) and proceed with the next RC under the Nutch TLP. -- Best regards, Andrzej Bialecki <>< ___. ___ ___ ___ _ _ __________________________________ [__ || __|__/|__||\/| Information Retrieval, Semantic Web ___|||__|| \| || | Embedded Unix, System Integration http://www.sigram.com Contact: info at sigram dot com