lucene-general mailing list archives: March 2010

Site index · List index
Message listThread · Author · Date
Re: Factor out a standalone, shared analysis package for Nutch/Solr/Lucene?
Michael McCandless   Re: Factor out a standalone, shared analysis package for Nutch/Solr/Lucene? Sun, 28 Feb, 10:57
Ian Holsman     Re: Factor out a standalone, shared analysis package for Nutch/Solr/Lucene? Sun, 28 Feb, 16:07
Shalin Shekhar Mangar       Re: Factor out a standalone, shared analysis package for Nutch/Solr/Lucene? Sun, 28 Feb, 18:32
Mark Miller         Re: Factor out a standalone, shared analysis package for Nutch/Solr/Lucene? Sun, 28 Feb, 18:43
Shalin Shekhar Mangar     Re: Factor out a standalone, shared analysis package for Nutch/Solr/Lucene? Sun, 28 Feb, 17:20
Marvin Humphrey     Re: Factor out a standalone, shared analysis package for Nutch/Solr/Lucene? Sun, 28 Feb, 17:32
Michael Busch     Re: Factor out a standalone, shared analysis package for Nutch/Solr/Lucene? Sun, 28 Feb, 17:52
Mark Miller       Re: Factor out a standalone, shared analysis package for Nutch/Solr/Lucene? Sun, 28 Feb, 18:39
Jason Rutherglen         Re: Factor out a standalone, shared analysis package for Nutch/Solr/Lucene? Sun, 28 Feb, 21:04
Grant Ingersoll       Re: Factor out a standalone, shared analysis package for Nutch/Solr/Lucene? Mon, 01 Mar, 00:30
Michael Busch         Re: Factor out a standalone, shared analysis package for Nutch/Solr/Lucene? Mon, 01 Mar, 05:05
Michael Busch           Re: Factor out a standalone, shared analysis package for Nutch/Solr/Lucene? Mon, 01 Mar, 05:26
Mark Miller             Re: Factor out a standalone, shared analysis package for Nutch/Solr/Lucene? Mon, 01 Mar, 13:25
Grant Ingersoll           Re: Factor out a standalone, shared analysis package for Nutch/Solr/Lucene? Mon, 01 Mar, 14:28
Grant Ingersoll             Re: Factor out a standalone, shared analysis package for Nutch/Solr/Lucene? Mon, 01 Mar, 14:33
Jason Rutherglen     Re: Factor out a standalone, shared analysis package for Nutch/Solr/Lucene? Mon, 01 Mar, 16:55
Chris Hostetter   Re: Factor out a standalone, shared analysis package for Nutch/Solr/Lucene? Mon, 01 Mar, 19:00
Ted Dunning     Re: Factor out a standalone, shared analysis package for Nutch/Solr/Lucene? Mon, 01 Mar, 19:26
Doug Cutting       Re: Factor out a standalone, shared analysis package for Nutch/Solr/Lucene? Mon, 01 Mar, 20:00
Re: Factor out a standalone, shared analysis package for Nutch/Solr/Lucene?
Mattmann, Chris A (388J)   Re: Factor out a standalone, shared analysis package for Nutch/Solr/Lucene? Sun, 28 Feb, 17:27
Mattmann, Chris A (388J)   Re: Factor out a standalone, shared analysis package for Nutch/Solr/Lucene? Sun, 28 Feb, 18:55
Mattmann, Chris A (388J)   Re: Factor out a standalone, shared analysis package for Nutch/Solr/Lucene? Mon, 01 Mar, 15:04
Mark Miller     Re: Factor out a standalone, shared analysis package for Nutch/Solr/Lucene? Mon, 01 Mar, 15:27
Grant Ingersoll     Re: Factor out a standalone, shared analysis package for Nutch/Solr/Lucene? Mon, 01 Mar, 15:33
Mattmann, Chris A (388J)   Re: Factor out a standalone, shared analysis package for Nutch/Solr/Lucene? Mon, 01 Mar, 16:20
Grant Ingersoll     Re: Factor out a standalone, shared analysis package for Nutch/Solr/Lucene? Mon, 01 Mar, 16:57
Mattmann, Chris A (388J)       Re: Factor out a standalone, shared analysis package for Nutch/Solr/Lucene? Mon, 01 Mar, 17:01
Robert Muir         Re: Factor out a standalone, shared analysis package for Nutch/Solr/Lucene? Mon, 01 Mar, 17:02
Simon Willnauer           Re: Factor out a standalone, shared analysis package for Nutch/Solr/Lucene? Mon, 01 Mar, 17:41
Michael McCandless         Re: Factor out a standalone, shared analysis package for Nutch/Solr/Lucene? Mon, 01 Mar, 17:44
Marvin Humphrey           Re: Factor out a standalone, shared analysis package for Nutch/Solr/Lucene? Mon, 01 Mar, 17:58
Michael McCandless             Re: Factor out a standalone, shared analysis package for Nutch/Solr/Lucene? Mon, 01 Mar, 18:03
Michael McCandless               Re: Factor out a standalone, shared analysis package for Nutch/Solr/Lucene? Mon, 01 Mar, 18:38
Mattmann, Chris A (388J)           Re: Factor out a standalone, shared analysis package for Nutch/Solr/Lucene? Mon, 01 Mar, 18:07
Michael McCandless             Re: Factor out a standalone, shared analysis package for Nutch/Solr/Lucene? Mon, 01 Mar, 18:25
Mattmann, Chris A (388J)               Re: Factor out a standalone, shared analysis package for Nutch/Solr/Lucene? Mon, 01 Mar, 18:28
Steven A Rowe                 RE: Factor out a standalone, shared analysis package for Nutch/Solr/Lucene? Mon, 01 Mar, 18:41
Michael McCandless                 Re: Factor out a standalone, shared analysis package for Nutch/Solr/Lucene? Mon, 01 Mar, 18:46
patrick o'leary                   Re: Factor out a standalone, shared analysis package for Nutch/Solr/Lucene? Tue, 02 Mar, 08:26
Michael Busch           Re: Factor out a standalone, shared analysis package for Nutch/Solr/Lucene? Mon, 01 Mar, 18:13
Michael McCandless             Re: Factor out a standalone, shared analysis package for Nutch/Solr/Lucene? Mon, 01 Mar, 19:22
Chris Hostetter           Re: Factor out a standalone, shared analysis package for Nutch/Solr/Lucene? Mon, 01 Mar, 18:43
Mark Miller             Re: Factor out a standalone, shared analysis package for Nutch/Solr/Lucene? Mon, 01 Mar, 19:27
Mattmann, Chris A (388J)   Re: Factor out a standalone, shared analysis package for Nutch/Solr/Lucene? Mon, 01 Mar, 18:46
Mattmann, Chris A (388J)   Re: Factor out a standalone, shared analysis package for Nutch/Solr/Lucene? Mon, 01 Mar, 18:48
Mattmann, Chris A (388J)   Re: Factor out a standalone, shared analysis package for Nutch/Solr/Lucene? Tue, 02 Mar, 07:17
Ranga Finding minimum and maximum value in a field Mon, 01 Mar, 13:06
Chris Hostetter   Re: Finding minimum and maximum value in a field Thu, 04 Mar, 17:54
Re: Factor out a standalone, shared analysis package for Nutch/Solr/Lucene?
Mattmann, Chris A (388J)   Re: Factor out a standalone, shared analysis package for Nutch/Solr/Lucene? Mon, 01 Mar, 15:40
Mark Miller     Re: Factor out a standalone, shared analysis package for Nutch/Solr/Lucene? Mon, 01 Mar, 15:54
Mattmann, Chris A (388J)       Re: Factor out a standalone, shared analysis package for Nutch/Solr/Lucene? Mon, 01 Mar, 16:06
Mark Miller         Re: Factor out a standalone, shared analysis package for Nutch/Solr/Lucene? Mon, 01 Mar, 16:11
Robert Muir         Re: Factor out a standalone, shared analysis package for Nutch/Solr/Lucene? Mon, 01 Mar, 16:12
Mattmann, Chris A (388J)   Re: Factor out a standalone, shared analysis package for Nutch/Solr/Lucene? Mon, 01 Mar, 15:44
Uri Boness   Re: Factor out a standalone, shared analysis package for Nutch/Solr/Lucene? Tue, 02 Mar, 17:39
Ard Schrijvers     Re: Factor out a standalone, shared analysis package for Nutch/Solr/Lucene? Wed, 03 Mar, 09:21
Grant Ingersoll       Re: Factor out a standalone, shared analysis package for Nutch/Solr/Lucene? Wed, 03 Mar, 14:06
Ard Schrijvers         Re: Factor out a standalone, shared analysis package for Nutch/Solr/Lucene? Wed, 03 Mar, 14:21
tavi.nathanson Boosting on *unique* term matches without using MUST Tue, 02 Mar, 03:03
Doug Cutting   Re: Boosting on *unique* term matches without using MUST Tue, 02 Mar, 18:35
Alex Davidson How to do prefix/phrase matching with term-length-sensitive scoring? Wed, 03 Mar, 15:27
Chris Hostetter   Re: How to do prefix/phrase matching with term-length-sensitive scoring? Thu, 11 Mar, 02:02
Andi Vajda [VOTE] Release PyLucene 2.9.2-1 and 3.0.1-1 (nag) Wed, 03 Mar, 18:48
Ralph Seward   Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 2.9.2-1 and 3.0.1-1 (nag) Wed, 03 Mar, 18:52
Michael McCandless   Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 2.9.2-1 and 3.0.1-1 (nag) Thu, 04 Mar, 20:40
Andi Vajda   Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 2.9.2-1 and 3.0.1-1 (nag) Thu, 04 Mar, 22:32
Grant Ingersoll     Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 2.9.2-1 and 3.0.1-1 (nag) Fri, 05 Mar, 16:57
Grant Ingersoll       Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 2.9.2-1 and 3.0.1-1 (nag) Fri, 05 Mar, 19:02
[VOTE] merge lucene/solr development
Yonik Seeley   [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development Wed, 03 Mar, 22:42
Mark Miller     Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development Wed, 03 Mar, 22:48
Michael McCandless     Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development Wed, 03 Mar, 22:49
Bill Au     Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development Wed, 03 Mar, 23:48
Mark Miller     Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development Wed, 03 Mar, 23:54
Michael Busch       Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development Thu, 04 Mar, 00:00
Mark Miller         Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development Thu, 04 Mar, 00:41
Yonik Seeley           Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development Thu, 04 Mar, 01:03
Michael Busch           Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development Thu, 04 Mar, 01:10
Yonik Seeley             Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development Thu, 04 Mar, 02:00
Michael Busch               Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development Thu, 04 Mar, 03:13
Robert Muir                 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development Thu, 04 Mar, 03:38
Bill Au                 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development Thu, 04 Mar, 04:29
Otis Gospodnetic                   Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development Thu, 04 Mar, 21:06
Yonik Seeley                     Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development Thu, 04 Mar, 21:13
Uwe Schindler                 RE: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development Thu, 04 Mar, 07:19
Michael McCandless                   Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development Thu, 04 Mar, 10:27
Uwe Schindler                     RE: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development Thu, 04 Mar, 10:51
Michael McCandless                       Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development Thu, 04 Mar, 13:40
Simon Willnauer                         Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development Thu, 04 Mar, 14:21
Mark Miller                           Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development Thu, 04 Mar, 14:33
Jukka Zitting                             Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development Thu, 04 Mar, 15:30
Mark Miller                               Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development Thu, 04 Mar, 15:40
Koji Sekiguchi                                 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development Thu, 04 Mar, 15:50
Grant Ingersoll                               Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development Thu, 04 Mar, 16:24
Mark Miller                                 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development Thu, 04 Mar, 17:08
Shalin Shekhar Mangar                         Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development Thu, 04 Mar, 14:30
Uwe Schindler                         RE: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development Thu, 04 Mar, 16:19
Grant Ingersoll                           Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development Thu, 04 Mar, 16:32
Otis Gospodnetic                           Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development Thu, 04 Mar, 21:03
Doug Cutting                           Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development Thu, 04 Mar, 23:08
Andi Vajda                         Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development Thu, 04 Mar, 16:51
Mark Miller                           Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development Thu, 04 Mar, 17:37
Bill Au                             Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development Thu, 04 Mar, 18:48
Mark Miller                               Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development Thu, 04 Mar, 18:57
Andi Vajda                                 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development Thu, 04 Mar, 19:13
Yonik Seeley                                   Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development Thu, 04 Mar, 20:22
Mark Miller                                   Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development Thu, 04 Mar, 20:28
Otis Gospodnetic                                   Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development Thu, 04 Mar, 20:45
Michael McCandless                                   Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development Thu, 04 Mar, 21:30
Chris Hostetter                   RE: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development Thu, 04 Mar, 17:41
Ted Dunning                     Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development Thu, 04 Mar, 17:50
Michael McCandless                     Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development Thu, 04 Mar, 18:04
Mark Miller                       Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development Thu, 04 Mar, 18:14
Chris Hostetter                       Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development Thu, 04 Mar, 18:16
Mark Miller                         Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development Thu, 04 Mar, 18:22
Chris Hostetter                           Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development Thu, 04 Mar, 18:45
Marvin Humphrey       Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development Thu, 04 Mar, 15:43
Mark Miller         Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development Thu, 04 Mar, 15:48
Robert Muir     Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development Thu, 04 Mar, 02:04
Ralph Seward     Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development Thu, 04 Mar, 14:26
Andrzej Bialecki     Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development Thu, 04 Mar, 15:31
Mattmann, Chris A (388J)     Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development Thu, 04 Mar, 15:35
Yonik Seeley     Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development Thu, 04 Mar, 17:00
Granroth, Neal V.     RE: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development Thu, 04 Mar, 17:17
Otis Gospodnetic     Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development Thu, 04 Mar, 17:43
Michael McCandless       Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development Thu, 04 Mar, 18:05
Chris Hostetter         Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development Thu, 04 Mar, 18:20
Mattmann, Chris A (388J)     Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development Thu, 04 Mar, 19:34
Mattmann, Chris A (388J)     Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development Thu, 04 Mar, 23:14
Doug Cutting       Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development Thu, 04 Mar, 23:25
Mattmann, Chris A (388J)   Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development Thu, 04 Mar, 19:09
Grant Ingersoll     Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development Thu, 04 Mar, 19:23
Sanne Grinovero       Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development Thu, 04 Mar, 19:57
Yonik Seeley   Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development Tue, 09 Mar, 05:17
Ryan McKinley   Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development Tue, 09 Mar, 07:16
Grant Ingersoll   Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development Tue, 09 Mar, 14:07
Mark Miller Fwd: Re: Vote on merging dev of Lucene and Solr Thu, 04 Mar, 14:34
Composing posts for both JIRA and email (was a JIRA post)
Marvin Humphrey   Composing posts for both JIRA and email (was a JIRA post) Thu, 04 Mar, 17:28
Simon Willnauer     Re: Composing posts for both JIRA and email (was a JIRA post) Thu, 04 Mar, 17:49
Michael McCandless     Re: Composing posts for both JIRA and email (was a JIRA post) Fri, 05 Mar, 10:36
Marvin Humphrey       Re: Composing posts for both JIRA and email (was a JIRA post) Fri, 05 Mar, 19:09
Michael McCandless         Re: Composing posts for both JIRA and email (was a JIRA post) Sat, 06 Mar, 09:30
Otis Gospodnetic Poll: solr-dev/java-dev overlap Thu, 04 Mar, 20:52
Yonik Seeley   Re: Poll: solr-dev/java-dev overlap Thu, 04 Mar, 21:01
Chris Hostetter   Re: Poll: solr-dev/java-dev overlap Thu, 04 Mar, 21:21
Mike Klaas     Re: Poll: solr-dev/java-dev overlap Wed, 10 Mar, 00:40
Shalin Shekhar Mangar   Re: Poll: solr-dev/java-dev overlap Thu, 04 Mar, 22:16
Grant Ingersoll   Re: Poll: solr-dev/java-dev overlap Wed, 10 Mar, 11:56
Otis Gospodnetic   Re: Poll: solr-dev/java-dev overlap Sun, 14 Mar, 19:44
Grant Ingersoll Board Report Due for Meeting on Wed, 17 March 2010 Thu, 04 Mar, 21:17
Michael McCandless [VOTE] Merge the development of Solr/Lucene (take 2) Thu, 04 Mar, 21:33
Michael McCandless   Re: [VOTE] Merge the development of Solr/Lucene (take 2) Thu, 04 Mar, 21:34
Mark Miller     Re: [VOTE] Merge the development of Solr/Lucene (take 2) Thu, 04 Mar, 21:35
Simon Willnauer       Re: [VOTE] Merge the development of Solr/Lucene (take 2) Thu, 04 Mar, 21:40
Yonik Seeley   Re: [VOTE] Merge the development of Solr/Lucene (take 2) Thu, 04 Mar, 21:42
Uwe Schindler   RE: [VOTE] Merge the development of Solr/Lucene (take 2) Thu, 04 Mar, 21:45
Shalin Shekhar Mangar   Re: [VOTE] Merge the development of Solr/Lucene (take 2) Thu, 04 Mar, 22:19
Andi Vajda   Re: [VOTE] Merge the development of Solr/Lucene (take 2) Thu, 04 Mar, 22:29
Robert Muir     Re: [VOTE] Merge the development of Solr/Lucene (take 2) Thu, 04 Mar, 22:42
Bill Au   Re: [VOTE] Merge the development of Solr/Lucene (take 2) Thu, 04 Mar, 23:06
Mattmann, Chris A (388J)   Re: [VOTE] Merge the development of Solr/Lucene (take 2) Thu, 04 Mar, 23:11
Michael Busch   Re: [VOTE] Merge the development of Solr/Lucene (take 2) Thu, 04 Mar, 23:13
Chris Hostetter   Re: [VOTE] Merge the development of Solr/Lucene (take 2) Thu, 04 Mar, 23:26
Grant Ingersoll     Re: [VOTE] Merge the development of Solr/Lucene (take 2) Fri, 05 Mar, 14:50
Chris Hostetter       Re: [VOTE] Merge the development of Solr/Lucene (take 2) Tue, 09 Mar, 22:38
Erik Hatcher         Re: [VOTE] Merge the development of Solr/Lucene (take 2) Wed, 10 Mar, 12:53
Grant Ingersoll     Re: [VOTE] Merge the development of Solr/Lucene (take 2) Fri, 05 Mar, 19:14
Koji Sekiguchi   Re: [VOTE] Merge the development of Solr/Lucene (take 2) Thu, 04 Mar, 23:38
Ryan McKinley   Re: [VOTE] Merge the development of Solr/Lucene (take 2) Tue, 09 Mar, 00:13
Otis Gospodnetic Q re merging dev MLs Thu, 04 Mar, 23:00
Mark Miller   Re: Q re merging dev MLs Thu, 04 Mar, 23:07
Doug Cutting   Re: Q re merging dev MLs Thu, 04 Mar, 23:21
Chris Hostetter     Re: Q re merging dev MLs Thu, 04 Mar, 23:35
Yonik Seeley [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Tue, 09 Mar, 02:11
Mark Miller   Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Tue, 09 Mar, 02:18
Mattmann, Chris A (388J)   Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Tue, 09 Mar, 02:22
Yonik Seeley     Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Tue, 09 Mar, 02:23
Mattmann, Chris A (388J)   Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Tue, 09 Mar, 02:32
Mark Miller     Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Tue, 09 Mar, 02:38
Michael Busch   Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Tue, 09 Mar, 02:49
Yonik Seeley     Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Tue, 09 Mar, 02:52
Grant Ingersoll       Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Tue, 09 Mar, 04:24
Michael Busch         Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Tue, 09 Mar, 05:14
Mark Miller           Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Tue, 09 Mar, 05:26
Mark Miller             Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Tue, 09 Mar, 05:37
Andrzej Bialecki         Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Tue, 09 Mar, 10:10
Michael McCandless           Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Tue, 09 Mar, 10:40
Andrzej Bialecki             Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Tue, 09 Mar, 11:09
Michael McCandless               Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Tue, 09 Mar, 11:26
Grant Ingersoll             Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Tue, 09 Mar, 12:21
Andrzej Bialecki               Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Tue, 09 Mar, 12:58
Michael McCandless               Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Tue, 09 Mar, 13:21
Grant Ingersoll                 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Tue, 09 Mar, 13:49
Yonik Seeley                   Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Tue, 09 Mar, 14:35
Mattmann, Chris A (388J)                   Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Tue, 09 Mar, 14:48
Robert Muir                     Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Tue, 09 Mar, 14:59
Yonik Seeley                     Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Tue, 09 Mar, 15:04
Mattmann, Chris A (388J)                       Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Tue, 09 Mar, 15:13
Robert Muir                         Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Tue, 09 Mar, 15:35
Mattmann, Chris A (388J)                           Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Tue, 09 Mar, 15:42
Robert Muir                             Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Tue, 09 Mar, 16:11
Mattmann, Chris A (388J)                               Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Tue, 09 Mar, 16:26
Robert Muir                                 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Tue, 09 Mar, 16:48
Michael Busch                           Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Tue, 09 Mar, 16:35
Yonik Seeley                             Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Tue, 09 Mar, 16:41
Michael Busch                               Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Tue, 09 Mar, 16:46
Dennis Kubes                               Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Tue, 09 Mar, 16:46
Grant Ingersoll                         Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Tue, 09 Mar, 15:46
Dennis Kubes                           Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Tue, 09 Mar, 15:59
Grant Ingersoll                             Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Tue, 09 Mar, 16:28
Grant Ingersoll                               Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Tue, 09 Mar, 16:34
Otis Gospodnetic                       Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Tue, 09 Mar, 17:23
Otis Gospodnetic                         Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Tue, 09 Mar, 17:38
Jason Rutherglen                           Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Tue, 09 Mar, 17:45
Grant Ingersoll                           Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Tue, 09 Mar, 22:00
patrick o'leary                             Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Tue, 09 Mar, 22:07
Otis Gospodnetic                             Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Sun, 14 Mar, 19:36
Yonik Seeley                               Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Sun, 14 Mar, 19:48
Otis Gospodnetic                                 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Sun, 14 Mar, 19:58
Yonik Seeley                                   Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Sun, 14 Mar, 20:09
Grant Ingersoll                     Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Tue, 09 Mar, 15:44
Mattmann, Chris A (388J)                       Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Tue, 09 Mar, 16:00
Yonik Seeley                         Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Tue, 09 Mar, 16:22
Granroth, Neal V.                         RE: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Tue, 09 Mar, 16:36
Michael McCandless                   Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Tue, 09 Mar, 16:46
Dennis Kubes             Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Tue, 09 Mar, 14:59
Mike Klaas         Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Wed, 10 Mar, 00:38
Mark Miller     Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Tue, 09 Mar, 02:56
Mattmann, Chris A (388J)   Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Tue, 09 Mar, 02:50
Mark Miller     Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Tue, 09 Mar, 02:58
Mattmann, Chris A (388J)   Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Tue, 09 Mar, 03:02
Mattmann, Chris A (388J)   Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Tue, 09 Mar, 03:16
patrick o'leary   Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Tue, 09 Mar, 03:16
patrick o'leary     Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Sun, 14 Mar, 03:36
Mark Miller       Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Sun, 14 Mar, 03:45
patrick o'leary         Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Sun, 14 Mar, 04:02
Grant Ingersoll       Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Sun, 14 Mar, 13:40
Ian Holsman   Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Tue, 09 Mar, 03:18
Mark Miller     Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Tue, 09 Mar, 03:28
Mattmann, Chris A (388J)   Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Tue, 09 Mar, 05:33
Mark Miller     Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Tue, 09 Mar, 05:40
Mark Miller       Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Tue, 09 Mar, 05:52
Dennis Kubes         Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Tue, 09 Mar, 06:10
Ted Dunning           Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Tue, 09 Mar, 06:46
Ian Holsman             Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) - can we take a pause? Tue, 09 Mar, 10:01
Dennis Kubes             Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Tue, 09 Mar, 14:45
Ted Dunning           Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Tue, 09 Mar, 06:51
Dennis Kubes             Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Tue, 09 Mar, 14:54
Chris Hostetter         Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Tue, 09 Mar, 22:54
Simon Willnauer           Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Wed, 10 Mar, 10:02
Shalin Shekhar Mangar   Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Tue, 09 Mar, 07:12
Michael McCandless   Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Tue, 09 Mar, 09:38
Jukka Zitting   Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Tue, 09 Mar, 10:03
Mattmann, Chris A (388J)   Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Tue, 09 Mar, 14:32
Mattmann, Chris A (388J)   Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Tue, 09 Mar, 14:58
Uwe Schindler   RE: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Tue, 09 Mar, 16:14
Mattmann, Chris A (388J)   Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Tue, 09 Mar, 16:29
Grant Ingersoll     Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Tue, 09 Mar, 16:35
Mattmann, Chris A (388J)   Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Tue, 09 Mar, 16:38
Andi Vajda   Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Thu, 11 Mar, 15:42
Ryan McKinley   Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Thu, 11 Mar, 17:08
Yonik Seeley   Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Fri, 12 Mar, 02:29
Mattmann, Chris A (388J)     Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Fri, 12 Mar, 03:29
Bernd Fondermann       Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Fri, 12 Mar, 11:47
Mattmann, Chris A (388J)         Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Fri, 12 Mar, 16:04
Bernd Fondermann           Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Fri, 12 Mar, 21:55
patrick o'leary     Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Fri, 12 Mar, 04:39
Simon Willnauer       Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Fri, 12 Mar, 06:39
Grant Ingersoll         Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Fri, 12 Mar, 12:00
Simon Willnauer           Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Fri, 12 Mar, 12:30
Michael Busch             Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Sun, 14 Mar, 05:26
Michael McCandless               Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Sun, 14 Mar, 10:28
Otis Gospodnetic               Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Sun, 14 Mar, 16:28
Yonik Seeley         Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Fri, 12 Mar, 13:47
Simon Willnauer           Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Fri, 12 Mar, 14:31
Dennis Kubes     Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Fri, 12 Mar, 12:54
Bernd Fondermann       Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Fri, 12 Mar, 13:26
Grant Ingersoll       Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Fri, 12 Mar, 13:59
Dennis Kubes         Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Fri, 12 Mar, 14:15
Mark Miller           Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Fri, 12 Mar, 14:24
Dennis Kubes             Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Fri, 12 Mar, 14:38
Mark Miller               Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Fri, 12 Mar, 14:51
patrick o'leary                 Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Fri, 12 Mar, 15:39
Bernd Fondermann           Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Fri, 12 Mar, 14:34
Grant Ingersoll           Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Fri, 12 Mar, 14:39
Dennis Kubes             Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Fri, 12 Mar, 15:22
Mattmann, Chris A (388J)   Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Fri, 12 Mar, 15:56
Grant Ingersoll     Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Fri, 12 Mar, 16:02
Otis Gospodnetic       Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Sun, 14 Mar, 15:04
Otis Gospodnetic       Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Sun, 14 Mar, 16:02
Yonik Seeley         Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Sun, 14 Mar, 16:22
Mattmann, Chris A (388J)   Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Fri, 12 Mar, 16:07
Grant Ingersoll     Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Fri, 12 Mar, 16:21
patrick o'leary       Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Fri, 12 Mar, 16:54
Grant Ingersoll         Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Fri, 12 Mar, 17:03
Otis Gospodnetic           Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Sun, 14 Mar, 16:12
Mark Miller             Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Sun, 14 Mar, 16:22
Otis Gospodnetic       Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Sun, 14 Mar, 16:07
Mattmann, Chris A (388J)   Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Sun, 14 Mar, 07:17
Re: final lucene/solr merge vote is up
Noble Paul നോബിള്‍ नोब्ळ्   Re: final lucene/solr merge vote is up Wed, 10 Mar, 02:35
Board Report Due
Grant Ingersoll   Board Report Due Wed, 10 Mar, 15:14
Mattmann, Chris A (388J)     Re: Board Report Due Wed, 10 Mar, 15:48
Marvin Humphrey     Re: Board Report Due Fri, 12 Mar, 23:41
Grant Ingersoll   Board Report Due Sat, 13 Mar, 13:35
Digy     RE: Board Report Due Sat, 13 Mar, 17:56
Grant Ingersoll       Re: Board Report Due Sun, 14 Mar, 13:35
Grant Ingersoll         Re: Board Report Due Mon, 15 Mar, 13:45
Berlin Buzzwords - Call for presentations
Simon Willnauer   Berlin Buzzwords - Call for presentations Thu, 11 Mar, 14:50
Re: Problem when the synonym has 2 words
Claudio R   Re: Problem when the synonym has 2 words Fri, 12 Mar, 00:36
Robert Muir     Re: Problem when the synonym has 2 words Fri, 12 Mar, 02:51
Simon Willnauer       Re: Problem when the synonym has 2 words Fri, 12 Mar, 06:41
Bernd Fondermann Umbrella Projects WAS: Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) Fri, 12 Mar, 14:58
Grant Ingersoll   Re: Umbrella Projects Fri, 12 Mar, 15:24
Andrzej Bialecki     Re: Umbrella Projects Fri, 12 Mar, 15:36
Grant Ingersoll       Re: Umbrella Projects Fri, 12 Mar, 15:45
Mattmann, Chris A (388J) Re: Umbrella Projects Fri, 12 Mar, 17:39
Otis Gospodnetic Less drastic ways Sun, 14 Mar, 16:28
Grant Ingersoll   Re: Less drastic ways Sun, 14 Mar, 16:40
Otis Gospodnetic     Re: Less drastic ways Sun, 14 Mar, 19:50
Michael McCandless       Re: Less drastic ways Sun, 14 Mar, 20:34
Otis Gospodnetic         Re: Less drastic ways Sun, 14 Mar, 21:29
Michael McCandless           Re: Less drastic ways Mon, 15 Mar, 10:51
Grant Ingersoll   Re: Less drastic ways Sun, 14 Mar, 16:43
Doug Cutting     Re: Less drastic ways Tue, 16 Mar, 17:06
Chris Hostetter       Re: Less drastic ways Thu, 18 Mar, 17:20
Mattmann, Chris A (388J)   Re: Less drastic ways Sun, 14 Mar, 16:51
Grant Ingersoll     Re: Less drastic ways Sun, 14 Mar, 16:57
Mattmann, Chris A (388J)   Re: Less drastic ways Sun, 14 Mar, 17:01
Re: [VOTE]: release Mahout 0.3 (resend, I forgot general@lucene.apache.org)
Grant Ingersoll   Re: [VOTE]: release Mahout 0.3 (resend, I forgot general@lucene.apache.org) Sun, 14 Mar, 22:40
Fwd: Will your project feature at ApacheCon North America 2010?
Grant Ingersoll   Fwd: Will your project feature at ApacheCon North America 2010? Tue, 16 Mar, 13:03
Simon Willnauer     Re: Will your project feature at ApacheCon North America 2010? Tue, 16 Mar, 13:39
Isabel Drost       Re: Will your project feature at ApacheCon North America 2010? Tue, 16 Mar, 17:07
Chris Hostetter     Re: Fwd: Will your project feature at ApacheCon North America 2010? Tue, 16 Mar, 22:58
Mattmann, Chris A (388J) Re: Will your project feature at ApacheCon North America 2010? Tue, 16 Mar, 18:34
Grant Ingersoll AC NA 2010 - Lucene Wed, 17 Mar, 13:31
Noirin Shirley   Re: AC NA 2010 - Lucene Wed, 17 Mar, 13:51
Grant Ingersoll     Re: AC NA 2010 - Lucene Wed, 17 Mar, 19:39
[ANN] Apache Mahout 0.3 Released
Robin Anil   [ANN] Apache Mahout 0.3 Released Thu, 18 Mar, 06:55
Robin Anil     [ANNOUNCE] Apache Mahout 0.3 Released Thu, 18 Mar, 07:37
New LuSolr trunk (was: RE: (LUCENE-2297) IndexWriter should let you optionally enable reader pooling)
Uwe Schindler   New LuSolr trunk (was: RE: (LUCENE-2297) IndexWriter should let you optionally enable reader pooling) Mon, 22 Mar, 12:27
Grant Ingersoll     Re: New LuSolr trunk (was: RE: (LUCENE-2297) IndexWriter should let you optionally enable reader pooling) Tue, 23 Mar, 13:15
Grant Ingersoll     Re: New LuSolr trunk (was: RE: (LUCENE-2297) IndexWriter should let you optionally enable reader pooling) Tue, 23 Mar, 13:39
Yonik Seeley       Re: New LuSolr trunk (was: RE: (LUCENE-2297) IndexWriter should let you optionally enable reader pooling) Tue, 23 Mar, 13:42
Grant Ingersoll AC 2010 Draft Blurb Mon, 22 Mar, 15:15
Mattmann, Chris A (388J)   Re: AC 2010 Draft Blurb Tue, 23 Mar, 15:26
Mattmann, Chris A (388J)   Re: AC 2010 Draft Blurb Tue, 23 Mar, 15:50
Mattmann, Chris A (388J)   Re: AC 2010 Draft Blurb Tue, 23 Mar, 15:57
Chris Hostetter   Re: AC 2010 Draft Blurb Tue, 23 Mar, 18:33
Grant Ingersoll     Re: AC 2010 Draft Blurb Wed, 24 Mar, 14:38
Mattmann, Chris A (388J)   Re: AC 2010 Draft Blurb Tue, 23 Mar, 18:39
Steven A Rowe Branding Solr+Lucene Mon, 22 Mar, 18:02
Mattmann, Chris A (388J)   Re: Branding Solr+Lucene Mon, 22 Mar, 18:07
Ryan McKinley   Re: Branding Solr+Lucene Mon, 22 Mar, 18:20
Yonik Seeley     Re: Branding Solr+Lucene Mon, 22 Mar, 18:30
Ted Dunning       Re: Branding Solr+Lucene Mon, 22 Mar, 19:15
Steven A Rowe       RE: Branding Solr+Lucene Mon, 22 Mar, 19:21
Chris Hostetter         RE: Branding Solr+Lucene Tue, 23 Mar, 18:43
Otis Gospodnetic           Re: Branding Solr+Lucene Tue, 23 Mar, 19:01
Grant Ingersoll             Re: Branding Solr+Lucene Tue, 23 Mar, 19:49
Jean-Michel RAMSEYER java.io.IOException: read past EOF Tue, 23 Mar, 21:36
Otis Gospodnetic   Re: java.io.IOException: read past EOF Tue, 23 Mar, 22:39
Michael McCandless   Re: java.io.IOException: read past EOF Wed, 24 Mar, 06:30
Ted Dunning     Re: java.io.IOException: read past EOF Wed, 24 Mar, 06:39
Michael McCandless       Re: java.io.IOException: read past EOF Wed, 24 Mar, 06:58
Grant Ingersoll Lucene Track Wed, 24 Mar, 17:10
Grant Ingersoll Apache Lucene EuroCon Call For Participation: Prague, Czech Republic May 20 & 21, 2010 Thu, 25 Mar, 00:03
Grant Ingersoll   Apache Lucene EuroCon Call For Participation: Prague, Czech Republic May 20 & 21, 2010 Tue, 30 Mar, 01:11
Grant Ingersoll Registration is now open for Apache Lucene EuroCon - Prague, Czech Republic, 18-21 May, 2010. Tue, 30 Mar, 18:45
Mattmann, Chris A (388J) [VOTE] Apache Tika 0.7 Release Candidate #1 Wed, 31 Mar, 20:01
Message listThread · Author · Date
Box list
Apr 201416
Mar 20146
Feb 201412
Jan 20144
Dec 20134
Nov 201314
Oct 201318
Sep 201321
Aug 201332
Jul 201315
Jun 201354
May 201336
Apr 201327
Mar 201351
Feb 20136
Jan 201338
Dec 201238
Nov 201228
Oct 201238
Sep 201229
Aug 201228
Jul 201234
Jun 20127
May 201231
Apr 201221
Mar 201212
Feb 201217
Jan 20129
Dec 201169
Nov 201135
Oct 201142
Sep 201172
Aug 201154
Jul 201160
Jun 201171
May 2011139
Apr 201193
Mar 201145
Feb 201157
Jan 201136
Dec 201091
Nov 2010145
Oct 201039
Sep 201018
Aug 201023
Jul 201033
Jun 201084
May 201025
Apr 201059
Mar 2010368
Feb 201072
Jan 201063
Dec 2009105
Nov 200984
Oct 200983
Sep 200951
Aug 200919
Jul 200993
Jun 2009104
May 2009112
Apr 200956
Mar 2009159
Feb 200937
Jan 200955
Dec 200860
Nov 200819
Oct 200840
Sep 200830
Aug 200833
Jul 200829
Jun 200825
May 200825
Apr 200825
Mar 200839
Feb 200841
Jan 200829
Dec 200719
Nov 20078
Oct 200712
Sep 200719
Aug 200715
Jul 200721
Jun 200716
May 200710
Apr 200711
Mar 200730
Feb 200711
Jan 20076
Dec 20062
Nov 200614
Oct 200654
Sep 20063
Aug 200639
Jul 200617
May 200625
Apr 20062
Mar 200610
Feb 200623
Jan 200613
Dec 20055
Oct 20056
Sep 200573
Aug 200534
Jul 200536
Jun 200510
May 200522
Apr 200511