Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 98739 invoked from network); 12 Mar 2010 14:32:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 12 Mar 2010 14:32:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 91202 invoked by uid 500); 12 Mar 2010 14:32:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-general-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 91172 invoked by uid 500); 12 Mar 2010 14:32:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 91164 invoked by uid 99); 12 Mar 2010 14:32:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 14:32:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.8 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,FREEMAIL_REPLYTO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of simon.willnauer@googlemail.com designates 209.85.220.216 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.216] (HELO mail-fx0-f216.google.com) (209.85.220.216) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 14:32:07 +0000 Received: by fxm8 with SMTP id 8so1229937fxm.5 for ; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 06:31:46 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:reply-to:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=qxrptyGtcCfSkhul9e0z/qik66DrrHFmGQSFEGkjIJ4=; b=Pq+X4Q1fLSTG7DOTaqUahou4ZNT+w3aK0I45BnRF8INuyYBpqMJXuwVgdp6Z1FdwB7 0fe+SF+U8Bb1cJOCVeMg1T7ArDC9tospFkNuODih5R25ldp19J8SLq/10YeMbmIFFfX8 lME6qH1CEQi3oRoxH5IfPYZ209SFpmwpGapR8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=uimejxXRdIyQGupml2MaRrYzJ7E10XKLILjhMt1bhsJ0rWmaNX0RNlt3W9Xkv5CSYJ 8tdcc4pAuG1MvxPFvUu06xV4+hbGQXmxv2+ZvkHWCIl+p4ZWFatuRn405bzwgwoyv1gZ dTR04kE13yIiki4D0NiNidYO43Mcm/d3koCm8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.103.4.25 with SMTP id g25mr1954900mui.59.1268404305367; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 06:31:45 -0800 (PST) Reply-To: simon.willnauer@gmail.com In-Reply-To: References: <1e33aedb1003112039y6ead45c6x51decefb73be5099@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 15:31:44 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) From: Simon Willnauer To: general@lucene.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 2:47 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote: > On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 1:39 AM, Simon Willnauer > wrote: >> I rather consider this as being far away from a >> consensus decision. > > You are correct - it's a majority decision, but certainly not a consensus= one. > There are some types of issues people will clearly never get full > consensus on - unfortunately this is one of them. =C2=A0More discussion a= nd > more votes wouldn't change the outcome. =C2=A0It may not seem fair that t= he > majority override the minority, but it's also not fair for the > minority to override or hold up progress of the majority. Agreed, I just wish we had more support on this. simon > > -Yonik >