Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 57812 invoked from network); 4 Mar 2010 14:31:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 4 Mar 2010 14:31:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 84394 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2010 14:30:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-general-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 84368 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2010 14:30:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 84360 invoked by uid 99); 4 Mar 2010 14:30:59 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Mar 2010 14:30:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of shalinmangar@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.48] (HELO mail-vw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.212.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Mar 2010 14:30:52 +0000 Received: by vws8 with SMTP id 8so1023219vws.35 for ; Thu, 04 Mar 2010 06:30:31 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=RiaJTU+OO0X7AhB7MiE5xOApaphGu367aRqLmpLWHsU=; b=wa/FMnz7V2fTFPUXwUQMnn/ZtzSmceA1j4ozgob83LSFYH+J9efQqq9nBrtER6b/oV XIAu4rJMIpGCyv+IoaiH4Ib1k/TvugaMsXYoHCHHRK5dQ8Y2geNjNiTTr8kVQKMos0Ml ILPaSvocqiG3X4NYI5IxvI+NGJSGN969Lm2Uk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=Dl+Hpnu1kEV+hYo5x+ZtnMDZi155lwhhPbPEDSgxmjrrEHaTuE3q/fPA9bHgdEdszU gfInrrC60xFU5udKoqxFOnuiNEpEex5ZjJuu6uXEu0KHQRp8XauG+8x8UWVfWMAYZ+Qn VNZKepSTT3xnuCCnGMUFJ1RPj5uP3OHcpa+ds= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.27.34 with SMTP id g34mr5723934qac.19.1267713029259; Thu, 04 Mar 2010 06:30:29 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <9ac0c6aa1003040540y41333d16ua957afa5f40363b4@mail.gmail.com> References: <4B8EF828.3080903@gmail.com> <4B8F01AE.8070609@gmail.com> <4B8F08A1.6070200@gmail.com> <4B8F2546.6040505@gmail.com> <004201cabb6a$f6698b40$e33ca1c0$@de> <9ac0c6aa1003040227x5f7fe46es20aee42ce6ee895@mail.gmail.com> <000601cabb88$964e2310$c2ea6930$@de> <9ac0c6aa1003040540y41333d16ua957afa5f40363b4@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2010 20:00:29 +0530 Message-ID: <69de18141003040630q5d003227n336830a23e21fc8b@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development From: Shalin Shekhar Mangar To: general@lucene.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00c09f8994f1c944320480fa7043 --00c09f8994f1c944320480fa7043 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 7:10 PM, Michael McCandless < lucene@mikemccandless.com> wrote: > > We are voting on this: > > * Merging the dev lists into a single list. > > * Merging committers. > > * When any change is committed (to a module that "belongs to" Solr or > to Lucene), all tests must pass > > * Release both at once (but the specific logistics is still up for > discussion) > > * Modularlize the sources: pull things out of Lucene's core (break > out query parser, move all core queries & analyzers under their > contrib counterparts), pull things out of Solr's core (analyzers, > queries) > > These things would not change: > > * Besides modularizing (above), the source code would remain factored > into separate dirs/modules the way it is now. > > * Issue tracking remains separate (SOLR-XXX and LUCENE-XXX issues) > > * User's lists remain separate. > > * Web sites remain separate. > > * Release artifacts/jars remain separate > > +1 -- Regards, Shalin Shekhar Mangar. --00c09f8994f1c944320480fa7043--