Mailing-List: contact general-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: general@lucene.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jukka.zitting@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.218.225 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :content-type;
        b=uA5VGs8EjMhL59bACEloIBAAQdAVDlpsXtpxxdLV2gVfQmLOPPmw+k4pO1/hrzudeA
         B+PagrtGoPF8K4avG/FUcwhXV1s3n8Pyxwc7MmRy4NAecZzxb4UBjJY+FVIFST7bfKon
         S9DnkAFBjnR9u29RpVkjTU8W68LIpifbPGtYE=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <c68e39171003081811o491137fdtc32452f1204a6130@mail.gmail.com>
References: <c68e39171003081811o491137fdtc32452f1204a6130@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jukka Zitting <jukka.zitting@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 11:03:22 +0100
Message-ID: <510143ac1003090203k117a4d3bk8f628d9d25b7b2fe@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3)
To: general@lucene.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Hi,

On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 3:11 AM, Yonik Seeley <yseeley@gmail.com> wrote:
> Please vote for the proposal quoted below to merge lucene/solr development.

+0 with my PMC member hat on, as I think this matter is up to the
Lucene and Solr developers to decide.

That said, I generally think having multiple distinct development
communities under one PMC is a bit troublesome (as we're seeing in
this discussion), so consolidating the community seems like a good
direction given that the technical synergies are there. On the other
hand I share Chris' concern about the massive scope of this vote. All
the proposed changes could IMHO just as well be handled as separate
and more easily reversible steps.

BR,

Jukka Zitting