Mailing-List: contact general-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: general@lucene.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of markrmiller@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.218.219 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references
         :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=roooe2MAutS810MBBT9jDgH1xByEcBBmMlbnlL4kH3NYvBBJpkcV/VYU6AP7y/8reY
         VjA0Qrixd/a9Q68Rm2u6IH3XcHubnKj8pz/QRVH8+aakyHrXp1rxShL5kOyzotQ0JjwL
         z0FomCqQxdujuqpDZ3mN2XdKWCXoYpmOsjO+w=
Message-ID: <4B90279F.60703@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2010 16:35:27 -0500
From: Mark Miller <markrmiller@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US;
 rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100222 Thunderbird/3.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: general@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Merge the development of Solr/Lucene (take 2)
References: <9ac0c6aa1003041333k5e6cb10by98f210c68245352@mail.gmail.com>
 <9ac0c6aa1003041334g53622e72jd8f873be10217849@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <9ac0c6aa1003041334g53622e72jd8f873be10217849@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

+1

On 03/04/2010 04:34 PM, Michael McCandless wrote:
> I forgot my vote: +1
>
> Mike
>
> On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Michael McCandless
> <lucene@mikemccandless.com>  wrote:
>    
>> A new vote, that slightly changes proposal from last vote (adding only
>> that Lucene can cut a release even if Solr doesn't):
>>
>>   * Merging the dev lists into a single list.
>>
>>   * Merging committers.
>>
>>   * When any change is committed (to a module that "belongs to" Solr or
>>    to Lucene), all tests must pass.
>>
>>   * Release details will be decided by dev community, but, Lucene may
>>    release without Solr.
>>
>>   * Modulariize the sources: pull things out of Lucene's core (break
>>    out query parser, move all core queries&  analyzers under their
>>    contrib counterparts), pull things out of Solr's core (analyzers,
>>    queries).
>>
>> These things would not change:
>>
>>   * Besides modularizing (above), the source code would remain factored
>>    into separate dirs/modules the way it is now.
>>
>>   * Issue tracking remains separate (SOLR-XXX and LUCENE-XXX
>>    issues).
>>
>>   * User's lists remain separate.
>>
>>   * Web sites remain separate.
>>
>>   * Release artifacts/jars remain separate.
>>
>> Mike
>>
>>      


-- 
- Mark

http://www.lucidimagination.com