From general-return-2236-apmail-lucene-general-archive=lucene.apache.org@lucene.apache.org Tue Mar 09 02:12:39 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 53729 invoked from network); 9 Mar 2010 02:12:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 9 Mar 2010 02:12:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 82275 invoked by uid 500); 9 Mar 2010 02:12:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-general-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 82235 invoked by uid 500); 9 Mar 2010 02:12:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 82227 invoked by uid 99); 9 Mar 2010 02:12:13 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 Mar 2010 02:12:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of yseeley@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.176] (HELO mail-wy0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 Mar 2010 02:12:07 +0000 Received: by wyb38 with SMTP id 38so2934334wyb.35 for ; Mon, 08 Mar 2010 18:11:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=rtLBLPgKvMQ4r8jUl1s/BwBRY6ruWrInSfFcX4IRkWM=; b=rNuAYT+w5oNo9UqbjJXqMWO78kmcLQQloB3TxHIRsL4NMzVDhTSg6DDSYiWighY+Yt hkwfeX7rUu1hBpJsMoyP5X292m6oINZHbpgNFZ3/k3qjzTApX9eOWNjXOss3Iy+1jJlB Z8Xc8VQjKh5eLohT0Zv34Mx8XsaqPRp+DfKHE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=d8jnEOA9kA48qki9w9TVlP9eKttmPoMKrfkMJNGZHONBoVU4DodBdp1Y/EPc5LjpPl yIGE3ox7iPMHwztT8UW5eGZ0WuJ26eEX5MJ013nJ8TpcaV6CZae5NZePbppXc6hxq33q ZbwXoDr5cHEReL2jFjDnmO8DxlKaIciCdsDnI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.86.209 with SMTP id w59mr1020526wee.186.1268100707021; Mon, 08 Mar 2010 18:11:47 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2010 21:11:46 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) From: Yonik Seeley To: general@lucene.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Apoligies in advance for calling yet another vote, but I just wanted to make sure this was official. Mike's second VOTE thread could probably technically stand on it's own (since it included PMC votes), but given that I said in my previous VOTE thread that I was just polling Lucene/Solr committers and would call a second PMC vote, that may have acted to suppress PMC votes on Mike's thread also. Please vote for the proposal quoted below to merge lucene/solr development. Here's my +1 -Yonik Mike's call for a VOTE (amongst lucene/solr committers +11 to -1): http://search.lucidimagination.com/search/document/a400ffe62ae21aca/vote_merge_the_development_of_solr_lucene_take_2#22d7cd086d9c5cf0 > Subject: Merge the development of Solr/Lucene (take 2) > A new vote, that slightly changes proposal from last vote (adding only > that Lucene can cut a release even if Solr doesn't): > > * Merging the dev lists into a single list. > > * Merging committers. > > * When any change is committed (to a module that "belongs to" Solr or > to Lucene), all tests must pass. > > * Release details will be decided by dev community, but, Lucene may > release without Solr. > > * Modulariize the sources: pull things out of Lucene's core (break > out query parser, move all core queries & analyzers under their > contrib counterparts), pull things out of Solr's core (analyzers, > queries). > > These things would not change: > > * Besides modularizing (above), the source code would remain factored > into separate dirs/modules the way it is now. > > * Issue tracking remains separate (SOLR-XXX and LUCENE-XXX > issues). > > * User's lists remain separate. > > * Web sites remain separate. > > * Release artifacts/jars remain separate.