From general-return-2253-apmail-lucene-general-archive=lucene.apache.org@lucene.apache.org Tue Mar 09 05:15:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 91311 invoked from network); 9 Mar 2010 05:15:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 9 Mar 2010 05:15:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 53759 invoked by uid 500); 9 Mar 2010 05:14:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-general-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 53589 invoked by uid 500); 9 Mar 2010 05:14:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 53580 invoked by uid 99); 9 Mar 2010 05:14:49 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 Mar 2010 05:14:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of buschmic@gmail.com designates 74.125.83.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.83.48] (HELO mail-gw0-f48.google.com) (74.125.83.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 Mar 2010 05:14:46 +0000 Received: by gwaa11 with SMTP id a11so3087033gwa.35 for ; Mon, 08 Mar 2010 21:14:26 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=v8kYd6m19XW7pZp9YP4Y8gofZGjuYY2NtFGm3UI+6RU=; b=FsJ88kSc6h5WUW15oKeDKpL19zLli0Fi3MwHo9Xo46z5X4vnDBtkTFjZKfe1psNLYR wNbUlF9Ct1c2Lzpos7mDYO7zAJ/ehca/UgSOqorhQu40wJnv5SlLif/hPMXfVG5eTAJD eAP26Zkhqn8QKZ/s//+aAaHI5AMjXV4yFmzIg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=fnbvbZINL/0iYdlYiTp5ZJyq9JCKPnNd9HQP7fSd8CfVhVVEFR84hucYK0kUMuo4x4 ru0zYW2M21um/6HQj+imriOVGLUcJmyvlYjrTIKZFNRb8ZknJpT6uYkmucymsVajZPar OwZRCxcHIIxWAs/czDufhTInHnKpn0tP49c7Y= Received: by 10.150.81.5 with SMTP id e5mr227870ybb.158.1268111665910; Mon, 08 Mar 2010 21:14:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from elchbert.local (c-98-248-34-169.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [98.248.34.169]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 34sm715809yxf.36.2010.03.08.21.14.24 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 08 Mar 2010 21:14:25 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4B95D930.8030307@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2010 21:14:24 -0800 From: Michael Busch User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) References: <4B95B71D.5050907@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 3/8/10 8:24 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: > I don't think any of it's a showstopper, I'm surprised here after reading the Apache voting page. This proposal contains points that involve code restructurings. > but at the same time we should try to address the concerns of those who voted -1 and see if a better solution can be developed so that they hopefully can become at least a 0 if not a +1. The whole point of the move is to build a stronger community, not a weaker one. > Yes I totally agree and thanks for saying that, Grant. We should try to make a decision so that the general mood in this community is good at the end and that everyone considers the outcome as beneficial for the whole project. This means that both sides have to be open for compromises. Michael