lucene-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Simon Willnauer <simon.willna...@googlemail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Merge the development of Solr/Lucene (take 2)
Date Thu, 04 Mar 2010 21:40:49 GMT
+1

On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 10:35 PM, Mark Miller <markrmiller@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> On 03/04/2010 04:34 PM, Michael McCandless wrote:
>>
>> I forgot my vote: +1
>>
>> Mike
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Michael McCandless
>> <lucene@mikemccandless.com>  wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> A new vote, that slightly changes proposal from last vote (adding only
>>> that Lucene can cut a release even if Solr doesn't):
>>>
>>>  * Merging the dev lists into a single list.
>>>
>>>  * Merging committers.
>>>
>>>  * When any change is committed (to a module that "belongs to" Solr or
>>>   to Lucene), all tests must pass.
>>>
>>>  * Release details will be decided by dev community, but, Lucene may
>>>   release without Solr.
>>>
>>>  * Modulariize the sources: pull things out of Lucene's core (break
>>>   out query parser, move all core queries&  analyzers under their
>>>   contrib counterparts), pull things out of Solr's core (analyzers,
>>>   queries).
>>>
>>> These things would not change:
>>>
>>>  * Besides modularizing (above), the source code would remain factored
>>>   into separate dirs/modules the way it is now.
>>>
>>>  * Issue tracking remains separate (SOLR-XXX and LUCENE-XXX
>>>   issues).
>>>
>>>  * User's lists remain separate.
>>>
>>>  * Web sites remain separate.
>>>
>>>  * Release artifacts/jars remain separate.
>>>
>>> Mike
>>>
>>>
>
>
> --
> - Mark
>
> http://www.lucidimagination.com
>
>
>
>

Mime
View raw message